Saturday, August 31, 2013

Stolen Art Watch, Pink Panthers Targeted, Art Crime Round Up



Swiss Pink Panther jewel thief back in prison

A combination of two undated pictures released by the Swiss police on July 26, 2013 shows (at L) a member of the Pink Panther gang Bosnian Milan Poparic and (at R) Switzerland's Adrian Albrecht. Picture: AFP
BASEL - A member of the Pink Panthers jewel thief gang was detained in Switzerland, one month after he staged an elaborate escape from a Swiss prison, police said Friday.
Fifty police officers were involved in the capture in a house in Chatel-St-Denis, in western Switzerland, on Thursday.
The 34-year old Bosnian had escaped a Swiss prison in Orbe in late July with the help of accomplices who drove through fences and held prison guards in check by firing automatic weapons.
Last week, French police caught a Macedonian-French Pink Panthers member who had escaped from another Swiss prison near Lausanne in May after accomplices had thrown cutting tools and a fake pistol into a prison courtyard.
The Pink Panthers are a network of hundreds of criminals from the former Yugoslavia. They have stolen jewellery worth more than 300 million euros (389 million dollars) since 1999 around the world, according to Interpol.

France refuses to extradite 'Pink Panther' suspect

NIMES, France / Gard (AFP) - France on Wednesday rejected a Swiss extradition request for a suspected member of the infamous Pink Panther gang of international jewel thieves who was arrested earlier this month.
Zoran Tomovic, born in Montenegro but with French and Macedonian citizenships, had been on the run since escaping from a Swiss prison in May, where he was serving time for armed robbery.
The 47-year-old, a former member of the French Foreign Legion elite force, was detained on August 19 at his home in the southern town of Bedarrides.
A court in Nimes, not far from the town, on Wednesday ruled against sending him to Switzerland as France does not extradite its own citizens.
Tomovic is suspected of having stolen jewels in Switzerland and other countries including Germany, Austria, Monaco, Britain, Japan, France and Dubai.
The court will examine on September 25 another extradition demand by Macedonia, where he was tried and convicted in absentia in 1998 for murder, as well as his request to be released.
The Pink Panthers emerged from the conflict in the former Yugoslavia to become the most successful jewel thieves in the world.
According to Interpol, they have since 1999 snatched jewels with a value in excess of 330 million euros ($440 million) in heists that are often executed with breathtaking speed and precision.
They gained their nickname with a raid on a London branch of Graff Diamonds in 2003, in which two of them posed as wealthy would-be customers, persuading staff to open doors for them before helping themselves to diamonds worth millions.
Although one of the robbers was overpowered at the scene and another later arrested, only a fraction of the diamonds were recovered, one of them hidden in a pot of face cream.
That was reminiscent of a scene from the 1975 film "The Return of the Pink Panther" and resulted in a nickname that the gang members themselves adopted, wearing pink shirts for a subsequent raid in Zurich. 

Church art thieves 'waiting to sell' – gardai

AN appeal for information on the theft of valuable Catholic church paintings has not led to a single call.

Despite offering a substantial reward for information on the theft of the six 'Stations of the Cross' paintings from St Peter and Paul's Church, near Athenry, Co Galway, two months ago, not one call was received.
Detectives now believe the gang behind the thefts may be biding their time before attempting to sell them off and could wait for up to a year before making any move.
Local parish priest Fr Michael McNamara said he and the local parish were slowly having to accept that the paintings may never be returned.
"There was not one call after we offered the reward," he said.
The church is now making final inquiries on having replicas of the missing six paintings made.
"We were hoping all the time they would be returned to us, but at this stage we have to accept we may never get them back. If we hear nothing in the next few weeks we will go ahead with the replicas and hope to have them ready for Christmas.
"Detectives believe they are still in the country and the thieves are waiting for an opportunity to sell them on, but it could take a year before anything is done."
The church is also erecting CCTV cameras next week in a bid to avoid any further thefts.
"I hate having to put CCTV in the church but people say we'll have to lock the church during the day if we don't," he added.
The six 'Stations of the Cross', painted by Irish artist Evie Hone, were stolen on June 22.
Gardai believe the theft was carried out by a professional gang after no trace or fingerprint was discovered following the robbery.
The keys to the back door of the church had been stolen one week prior to the incident. The pieces had not been secured to the wall and no damage was done to the church during the robbery. Gardai have alerted auction houses in Ireland to be on the lookout. Interpol is also assisting in the investigation.
The six oil paintings stolen depict the scenes from the third, fourth, fifth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth Stations of the Cross.

Despite Pledge, France Lags in Hunt for Looted Art

PARIS — When France’s culture minister, AurĂ©lie Filippetti, handed over six looted 18th-century paintings to a Boston man in March, she declared a new “proactive approach” to tracking the original owners of recovered artworks that were stolen by the Nazis.

The announcement was welcomed here and abroad as an overdue step after decades of bureaucratic resistance to returning the art in a nation scarred by the most systematic plunder of any country during World War II.
But since that pledge nearly six months ago, there has been scant evidence of change. Ms. Filippetti created two groups to study the subject and submit progress reports to her, one due at the end of the year to describe objects that can be tracked and a second due next summer. No additional funds have been earmarked for research, and no additional staff members have been hired or dedicated to this project, Thierry Bajou, the ministry official in charge of the recovery effort, acknowledged.
There is one employee assigned to research unclaimed art in French museums — a laborious process. At the Foundation for the Memory of the Shoah, there is a specialist in the World War II art market who advises the ministry project but also juggles part-time work maintaining cultural archives.
During the German occupation, about 100,000 art objects were confiscated from Jews in France and sent to Germany by train. Although more than 61,000 were recovered and more than 45,000 returned by 1949, thousands have not yet been reunited with their owners. More than 2,000 of the works that were considered orphaned were distributed among 57 French museums. Since 1951, barely more than 100 of these have been returned.
In a recent response to questions by e-mail, Ms. Filippetti, who declined to be interviewed in person, counseled patience. It is more difficult to identify looted art today because of “the deaths of the victims and their direct descendants,” she said, “and not because of a lack of will on the part of museums.” She said she expects three or four works to be returned over the next two years. “Until now, we have waited for inheritors or relatives to trigger research procedures,” Ms. Filippetti said in March. “I want to introduce a more proactive approach under which France will seek the owners whether or not a formal request has been made.”
The culture minister’s declaration came on the heels of pressure from Corinne Bouchoux, a French senator in the Green Party, who had issued a legislative report on the recovery efforts. Her report — a strategy to develop “clean museums” — was particularly critical of the lack of public access to French archives that prevents descendants from gathering vital evidence to press claims dating back to the chaotic days of the war. Some records, including those of the Louvre, are closed to the public, and there is limited access or none at all to many of the other archives, which are held by museums and government or military agencies. Ms. Bouchoux said that, in addition to the 2,000 works known to have been turned over to museums, there may be another 4,000 with murky origins that were purchased during the war and later donated to museums. Their contributors were often listed as anonymous in order to give the works legitimacy.
No effort has been made to conduct a comprehensive audit or track down the owners or their families for any of these works, she said in an interview. “Everyone believed that this problem was settled but it was a delusion,” Ms. Bouchoux said. “It was a collective forgetting.”
She plans to introduce legislation to force museums to accelerate the process if the culture ministry does not follow up on its pledge.
In other countries, some museums have taken a more aggressive approach. In 2006, the Dutch government returned 202 paintings from its national collection to the heir of a Jewish art dealer whose Amsterdam gallery had been looted by Hermann Goering. Vienna has handed over almost 6,000 looted objects since it started an audit 14 years ago of more than 70,000 items in museums and libraries. Some art historians have taken extraordinary measures to work around the French system, where descendants complain that they remain at the mercy of bureaucrats who can unilaterally decide whether to allow access or not.
Elizabeth Royer, a Paris gallery owner and art historian who specializes in the provenance of works, decided the only way to circumvent the system was to create her own archives. Four years ago, she and her assistants started systematically photographing records held by the French Foreign Ministry. The results now fill the basement of her building. She opens her archives to other researchers and officials from foreign museums who say they find access through the gallery owner easier than through the French authorities. Ms. Royer, who has helped descendants recover a dozen looted paintings, said she remains pessimistic about any change in policy in France, where the topic has long been a source of shame, indifference and resistance.
“There are a lot of people who say time has passed, and this is enough,” she said. “I would agree if the archives are open, but so many things are hidden and closed.”
That is the primary complaint of descendants who have struggled to navigate the bureaucracy. Alexandre Bronstein, a great-great-nephew of the art collector Julie Reinach, has spent years searching for works plundered in 1941 by Nazis who burned the family home in St.-Germain-en-Laye.
“The basic view of museum curators is that this is ours,” said Mr. Bronstein, who said he has encountered resistance at institutions when he has sought to look at the backs of paintings for telltale marks of his family member.
Alain Monteagle, 65, a retired history teacher, is hunting among museum holdings for parts of an art collection taken from an aunt, Anna Jaffe. Ms. Royer’s documents show that in 1943 in Nice, Ms. Jaffe’s possessions were auctioned off in a fire sale of trinkets, bronzes, and “important paintings, ancient and modern,” which included landscapes by John Constable.
Unlike many descendants, Mr. Monteagle and his relatives have managed to obtain the return of eight artworks from the Louvre and the Kimbell Art Museum in Fort Worth. He has volunteered to help the research groups. His view is that, despite the culture minister’s pronouncements, there has been no change in museum behavior. “But then,” he noted, “a few months is not long for the French state.”
Some experts say increased availability to information through social networking tools and other Internet resources could make the search easier.
The Centre Pompidou cultural complex, which holds 44 paintings looted during the war, insists it is trying to reflect a proactive spirit. After Ms. Bouchoux, the French senator, issued her critique and recommendations, it posted a list of the works and a new subject on its online database: “Works recovered in Germany after the fall of the Third Reich.”
The information is not easy to find, but the museum plans to lend three orphan paintings by Fedor Löwenstein for an exhibition in Bordeaux that could help publicize the unclaimed art. All were donated as a mysterious gift to the museum in 1973. In 2011, they were reclassified as stolen works.

How Posters Stolen By The Nazis Resurfaced At A Jewish Museum In South Florida



Hans Sachs left this earth without knowing what happened to his beloved poster collection.
In 1898, when Sachs was a teenager, he began collecting posters in Berlin of advertisements, political propaganda and rare pieces by famed artists such as Cheret, Kandinsky and Lucian Bernhard.
His passion for graphic art was so serious he amassed 12,500 posters and a separate collection of 18,000 tins, postcards and theater programs reflective of this art form.
He kept them stored and on display in a specially built room in his home. But one fateful day in 1938, Nazis swooped in and forced Sachs to pack up and load his entire collection in trucks waiting outside. His collection was swept away.
When Sachs was later thrown into Sachsenhausen Concentration Camp, his wife Felicia made a convincing plea to have him released. Shortly after, he, his wife and their one-year-old son Peter fled Germany to live in the United States.
In 1966, Hans Sachs learned that some of his collection had emerged in East Berlin, but he failed to reclaim it. A Harvard-educated dentist and world leading poster collector, he died in 1974.



“My father never discussed what happened to his posters, but he always expressed his love for the art form,” wrote Peter Sachs from Las Vegas, and until recently, was a longtime Sarasota resident.
In 2005,  Peter Sachs unlocked the mystery of the whereabouts of his father’s posters. He did what many do online when a question arises. He Googled it, resulting in the discovery that the German Historical Museum in Berlin had archived and displayed a portion of his father’s collection since the fall of the Berlin Wall.
He sought legal counsel, hired a law firm then launched a painstaking seven-year battle to reclaim his father’s posters from the German museum. The case went all the way to Germany’s high court, and in October 2012, Sachs was finally awarded 4,344 posters, nearly 74 years after they were confiscated.
“It was a bittersweet victory. I felt vindicated by the German High Court ruling, but my father didn’t live to see his beloved posters returned to him. I also thought the German government behaved disgracefully during the whole process,” he wrote.



Now with the posters intact, Sachs has graciously allowed the Jewish Museum of Florida-FIU to showcase 21 of them as part of an exhibition running through December 2013.
“This is the first time a museum in the United States has displayed any of the posters. There is currently an exhibition of some of the posters in Affiche Museum, which is the Dutch Poster Museum in Hoorn, The Netherlands,” Sachs wrote. “ A few years ago, the Jewish Museum [of Florida-FIU] had an exhibition on Nazi looted art. They included information about my father’s collection and my battle to get it back in the exhibition. I felt a special connection to the museum at FIU and always hoped that if I won the court battle, some of the posters would be displayed there.”
And so they are in all their glory with rich, vivid colors still intact.
Visit www.jewishmuseum.com for more information.

What if You Found a Diamond? The Mitzvah of Returning Lost Objects


Leaving aside religious conviction, local laws, and even secular morality for a moment, consider this question: What would you do if you were homeless and stumbled across a very valuable object that could help you eat and get back on your feet?

A diamond engagement ring was accidently thrown into homeless Billy Ray Harris’ cup but when he saw Sarah Darling again, he made sure to get the ring back to her. Once this good deed hit the headlines, over 7,000 donors have pledged over $150,000 to support Harris. Harris’ response is most telling: “I like it, but I don’t think I deserve it… What has the world come to when a person returns something that doesn’t belong to him, and all this happens?” What Harris considered the obvious right thing to do, and his motivation to carry that out in the face of a lucrative (and probably much-needed) payoff, may not be everyone’s inclination, but it should be.

Jewish law is unequivocal about the obligation to return lost items (Deuteronomy 22). The Torah prohibits ignoring property that clearly was lost and keeping a lost object, and  commands returning such an item. Halakhah says that these laws only apply to objects that have a siman (a distinguishing feature that only an owner would be able to identify). A typical $1 bill on a sidewalk, for example, has no distinguishing feature indicating that it has a particular owner. This limitation only applies, of course, if there is no other way to identify who the owner is. The rabbis teach that it is midat hasidut (pious and good) to work to return a lost object even when it has no clear unique feature to it.  How does our modern society fare on this subject?

Some data on lost items is encouraging. Worldwide, in 2009 airlines lost 300,000 bags of luggage, more than half during flight transfers. About 97 percent of these bags were eventually returned to their owners, but about 80,000 bags were eventually given away, offered for sale, or destroyed. In another largely encouraging example, in 2012, the ASPCA published the results of a poll of cat and dog owners. Of those reported as lost, 93 percent of dogs and 75 percent of cats were returned to their owners. Of dogs found, only 15 percent were identified by microchip or identification tags and 6 percent were found in shelters, so most were returned by the good will of strangers.

Sadly, there are also many examples of people who were tempted to take what did not belong to them or to hide items that came to them through unethical means. For example, as of October 2012, about 400 TSA employees have been fired for stealing items from airline passenger luggage.

The art world, even in the best of times, is filled with fraud, as many art works have "disappeared" from museums and never reappeared, most likely because an unscrupulous art collector has hidden it away in their private quarters. One of the most notorious examples of modern art theft occurred during the Nazi era, when thousands of art objects were stolen from Jewish citizens and museums throughout Europe. In the succeeding decades, many of these objects were returned to the original owners or their descendants, but progress has been slow. In 1998, the United States joined more than 40 other nations in signing the Washington Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, which was supposed to set up principles that would help descendants of former owners recover art objects stolen by the Nazis. However, the Holocaust Art Restitution Project and other organizations have accused many American museums of deliberately being uncooperative or delaying the transfer of these art objects to their rightful owners. If the accusations are true, the museums would be violating the Jewish commandment not to keep a stolen object and not to hide the stolen object in order to retain possession.

While much of the documentation on many objects stolen during Nazi rule is murky, there is no contesting the facts of the most famous case of stolen art. The "Elgin Marbles," statues taken from the Parthenon in Athens by the British ambassador in the early 19th century and still on display at the British Museum in London, have drawn controversy for some time. The Greek government has requested their return for about 30 years, but the British are adamant that the Parthenon statues belong to the world and that they have the best ability to display them, an argument that betrays a continuing colonial attitude. The UNESCO convention in 1970 established rules (mostly voluntary) restricting the ability of one nation to expropriate property from another country without legal authority, but these rules only cover transactions after 1970.

These types of rules, and people regularly and without fanfare carrying them out, are both a mitzvah in the Jewish sense and a norm that builds trust within and across societies. When one has lost something, it can be very disorienting. If a lost item is returned, it rebuilds ones sense of trust in one’s fellow person. Daily, we see inspiring examples of those who go out of their way to return valuables, while we also see depressing examples of people who claim to be refined, yet behave in a deceitful manner to prevent people from recovering lost goods. Jewish law can teach us much in promoting and achieving a just society, and universal morality and shifting social norms will create needed change. Whatever the source, looking out for our fellows and the worldly possessions that contribute to who we are, the integrity that comes with acquiring something honestly, will ensure deeper societal trust making the world a better place to live.

Rabbi Dr. Shmuly Yanklowitz is the Executive Director of the Valley Beit Midrash, the Founder & President of Uri L’Tzedek, the Founder and CEO of The Shamayim V’Aretz Institute and the author of “Jewish Ethics & Social Justice: A Guide for the 21st Century.” Newsweek named Rav Shmuly one of the top 50 rabbis in America.”

Isle of Man police probe 'heirloom' coin theft

Police have launched an investigation after about 60 ancient coins were stolen from a house in the Isle of Man.
A spokesman said the antiques, which include several 19th Century gold sovereigns, were taken from a house in Ballasalla between May and July.
The coins, thought to be worth several thousand pounds, also include a silver US dollar which was minted in 1921.
PC Adrian Brooks said the theft of the family "heirlooms" had caused "financial loss and distress."
He added: "Due to the large amount of coins and their unusual nature, I am hopeful that if someone has seen the coins or perhaps been offered them to buy that they will remember them."
Anyone with information is asked to contact Port Erin Police Station.

$39K in paintings stolen from shed

The Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office is investigating the theft of $39,400 worth of paintings from a storage shed.
The owner, an art dealer, told deputies that someone cut a padlock on his unit at Butterfly Springs Storage in Pojoaque sometime between Sunday and Monday. Once inside, the burglar took a speaker and five framed paintings. These paintings are described in an incident report as a “Machrado” painting, a hide painting, a cathedral painting, a diptych painting and a painting of a flute player.
Deputies are awaiting a surveillance video of the storage unit. They also found a wine glass inside that had several fingerprints on it. The glass will be analyzed by the state crime lab. 

Antique thieves target delivery van

THOUSANDS of euro worth of antiques were taken by opportunist thieves last week after a van containing the antiques was stolen in Limerick city over the weekend.
And the owner of the van and the associated antique store believes that he was followed prior to the theft and his movements were observed and noted before the thieves struck.
The van, a dark blue Fiat Ducato, was taken from outside St John’s Cathedral on Friday between 4pm and 5pm.
Gardai said that the van was recovered but the items contained inside were stolen.
Both the owner and gardai are appealing for witnesses to the incident to come forward and assist with the investiogation.
Patrick, who is in the antiques business took to local radio to explain his plight and believes that the thieves were targeting the van specifically for its contents.
“We would have been spotted driving the van around town and maybe the doors were open and closed a few times and I think we were followed so guys would have been waiting for the opportunity.”
Describing the 2007 Cork registered van, Patrick told Limerick’s Live 95FM that the registration of the van is 07C6544 and he is hoping that members of the public in the area noticed the movements of the unscrupulous thieves involved.

Sacred art stolen from Andean churches

The thieves tunneled under the thick walls of the colonial-era Roman Catholic church in the tiny southern Bolivian town of San Miguel de Tomave, emerged through the floor and made off with five 18th-century oil paintings of inestimable value.

Sacred art stolen from Andean churches
'Jesus con la Cruz a Cuesta' was stolen from the San Pedro de la Paz church in 2003 and recovered in Lima in 2005 Photo: AP
It was the third time the highlands church had been plundered of sacred art since 2007. Most of the finely-etched silver that once graced its altar was already gone.
"Who would have thought they would take the canvases, too?" the Rev. Francisco Dubert, the parish priest, asked of the oil paintings depicting the Virgin Mary.
Increasingly bold thefts plague colonial churches in remote Andean towns in Bolivia and Peru, where authorities say cultural treasures are disappearing at an alarming rate. At least 10 churches have been hit so far this year in the two culturally rich but economically poor countries.
"We think the thefts are being done on behalf of collectors," said the Rev. Salvador Piniero, archbishop of Peru's highlands Ayacucho province. Religious and cultural authorities say criminal bands are stealing "to order" for foreigners.
Bolivian churches have been robbed 38 times of 447 objects since 2009 - of highly stylized decorative silverwork, canvases, polished gold and silver altar pieces and gem-encrusted jewelry, said the country's cultural patrimony chief, Lupe Meneses.
In Peru, at least 30 thefts from churches and chapels have been reported since January 2012, including two this month: Churches in Ayacucho and Puno provinces were robbed of ornamental silver laminate, or gold and silver crowns, earrings and necklaces.
In Tomave, other canvases were left behind, Mr Dubert said, indicating the thieves knew exactly what they wanted. "These churches are being robbed because terrible people want to own beautiful things." Donna Yates, a University of Glasgow archaeologist blogged afterward.
Dr Yates, who is studying the Andes thefts for a global, European Union-funded project, said the hemorrhaging of priceless ecclesiastical art in the region has continued at a steady pace "but it's getting more brazen."
"Who is behind it? I can't say," she said. "The market for these goods is in Europe and the United States," she says, with Santa Fe, New Mexico, one destination as a magnet for collectors of Latin American art.
Cultural officials in the Andes have long struggled to protect Incan and pre-Columbian cultural treasures. Now, colonial sacred art has become a similar worry. By law, it is all national patrimony, its export illegal.
Where possible, churches are being fortified. Video cameras were installed and nighttime guards posted last year at Ayacucho's main cathedral in Huamanga, host to Peru's biggest annual religious pilgrimage.
But poor, rural parishes are on their own, particularly along the highlands plateau where Spanish colonial missionaries built isolated settlements.
In January, church thieves stole 12 gold crowns and a pair of silver shoes of a baby Jesus statue in the isolated Ayacucho town of Santo Domingo de Chungui, said regional culture director Mario Cueto.
He appealed afterward "for greater monitoring on highways and at international airports." But the thefts almost always go unsolved.
In one of the most audacious thefts, national treasures disappeared in April from the Church of the Virgin of Copacabana on Lake Titicaca.
A wooden 16th-century statue of Bolivia's patron saint was stripped of 18 precious jewels worth an estimated $1 million by thieves who poisoned two mastiffs and laced the parish workers' evening meal with tranquilizers. While everyone slept, the thieves broke a window and gained entry with a ladder.
A visiting priest and the female owner of a hostel where he was staying were arrested in the theft. Prosecutors say they are suspected of assisting a criminal gang.
Most targets are more like the Tomave church, unprotected by anything more than a lock and chain on the door when last burgled in December. Most are built above 13,100 feet and at least 60 miles from the nearest police station. As for burglar alarms, electricity is unreliable when it exists at all.
"Security is impossible," said Dr Yates. "You are left with the kind of situation where you could either try to take all the goods out of these rural churches, which is ethnically questionable because you are taking people's heritage away from them."
Even if the art were removed, there is no place to safely store it.
Not even the La Merced church in Bolivia's southern regional capital of Potosi, whose silver mine was once the Spanish empire's economic engine, was immune from one of the year's biggest heists.
Among loot stolen after an alarm was deactivated: An 18th-century scapular shield encrusted with pearls, diamonds, rubies and emeralds worth an estimated $1 million. Also taken: part of a huge silver archway laminate. 

How stolen Dutch art fooled even Sotheby's expert eyes

A cunningly disguised stolen work by Dutch contemporary artist Jan Schoonhoven managed to fool experts at the world's largest art broker Sotheby's, who auctioned it in late June for nearly $300,000.

Now Dutch police are investigating and questions are being asked how the modern art relief, sculpted in 1969 by one of the country's best-known fine artists, managed to slip through the net of a carefully managed system to end up on a London auction block.
Simply named "R69-32" -- referring to the year of creation and an identification number -- the white rectangular work which consists of blocks filled with triangles made of papier-mache, disappeared from the Van Bommel Van Dam Museum in the eastern city of Venlo in March.
It was one of four pieces stolen at the time. How they disappeared and who took them remains a mystery and forms part of the police investigation.
Paul van Rosmalen, a Schoonhoven expert who works for Amsterdam's Borzo Modern and Contemporary Art gallery, was the first to spot the deception.
"The work was simply turned on its side and the series number slightly altered," Van Rosmalen told AFP.
He said the thief changed the series number from "32" to "39" therefore passing it off as a different work.
Schoonhoven, who died in 1994, produced numerous works in series from papier mache which were almost identical in appearance and very hard to tell apart.
It was a simple but devious scheme -- and effective enough to fool even the experts at Sotheby's, Van Rosmalen said.
Immediately after the March 22 break-in, Van Bommel Van Dam museum officials notified the London-based Art Loss Register (ALR), the world's largest database of stolen art, about the theft.
Apart from R69-32, three other works, two by Schoonhoven and one by Czech contemporary artist Tomas Rajlich, also disappeared.
Barely three months later however, the now altered "R69-39" showed up for auction at Sotheby's, which was then alerted by the ALR, saying it might potentially match a stolen art work in their database.
Sotheby's, however, said it "confirmed to the Art Loss Register that the title on the back of our work did not match the title in their records."
"The ALR did not follow up to notify us that they nevertheless believed the work was indeed a stolen work," the auction house said in a statement.
At a resulting auction on June 27, "R69-39" fetched a price of 182,500 pounds (213,000 euros, $285,000) and was combinedly bought by the Borzo in Amsterdam and London's Mayor Gallery.
Borzo's Van Rosmalen became suspicious looking at pictures of the work sent by colleagues in London.
"Looking at the pictures I was sent it is very clear that the title on the "2" on the back had been changed to a "9", therefore R69-32 became R69-39," he said.
Sotheby's confirmed that the sale has now been put on ice.
ALR chairman Julian Radcliffe told AFP it did not go further than the initial alert it gave Sotheby's because "neither we nor Sotheby's knew that the number had been changed."
Nobody in the case doubted Sotheby's good intentions either.
As for the three other stolen artworks, just over a week ago, a man walked into an Amsterdam police station bearing the two other Schoonhoven reliefs and the Rajlich work stolen together with "R69-32".
Identified only as "Ryan L." in the Dutch media, the man was arrested on the spot.
Ryan L. however, said he was simply returning the stolen works which he claimed he had bought for 100 euros, Dutch daily NRC Handelsblad reported.
"All three art works have been authenticated as the ones stolen in March," Dutch police told AFP, confirming an investigation was underway.
In the meantime, Theo Manders, the collector to whom the artworks belonged at the time of the March theft, had been paid out 1.1 million euros in an insurance claim, Van Bommel Van Dam Museum spokesman Paul Hermans told AFP.


Judge dresses down defendant in hunting camp burglary: 'You've got to be kidding'








Walker-Smith-Ambrose.jpg 
From left to right, Matthew Boykin Walker, Timothy Smith and Kristopher Joseph Ambrose will go to prison after a judge sentenced them on Friday, Aug. 23, 2013, in Mobile, Ala., on federal firearms charges.
MOBILE, Alabama – Developer Matthew Boykin Walker admitted three years ago to harboring more than $500,000 worth of stolen antiques but avoided prison time when it came to his sentencing.
On Friday, the scion of a wealthy and prominent south Alabama family was not as fortunate as he stood in federal court to answer for a criminal charge related to the break-in of his elderly uncle’s hunting camp in McIntosh.
Following a lengthy sentencing hearing, U.S. District Judge Kristi DuBose sentenced Walker to five years and three months in prison – higher than prosecutors had requested – and toyed with the idea of imposing even harsher punishment.
DuBose shot down a suggestion by defense attorney John White that she hand down a non-prison sentence that would include time spent at Serenity Care, a substance abuse treatment program where Walker performed community service as part of his probation in the state case related to the stolen antiques.
The judge noted that Walker, 63, met his co-defendants in the federal case at that facility and got them involved. She suggested that the defendant took advantage of troubled men.
“You’ve got to be kidding,” she said.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Gina Vann, in honoring the plea agreement she struck with the defendant, stuck to the recommendation of a prison sentence of four years and three months. But she blasted what she regarded as his “self-serving” explanation in court Friday.
“He was born on third base and is sitting in here now acting like he hit a triple,” she said.
“He put on a charade here today.”
Leniency for co-defendants
DuBose sentenced co-defendants Timothy Smith and Kristopher Joseph Ambrose to lighter sentences, giving them breaks for their cooperation, which included testimony on Friday against Walker.
DuBose ordered Walker pay his uncle, Bob Boykin, $42,000 that remains unaccounted for from the theft of his safe.
Walker, a relative of the late Congressman Frank Boykin, was on probation in the stolen-antiques case when he and Smith removed a large safe from the McIntosh cabin in February. Smith, whom DuBose sentenced to two years and four months for possession of stolen firearms, testified that Walker asked him to ride up with him to help him retrieve some important papers from Boykin’s property.
When they got there, Smith said, he and Walker pushed the safe across the floor and loaded it into the back of Walker’s pickup truck. They then drove to Walker’s home in south Mobile County, Smith testified. He said Walker got a blowtorch from Dog River Marina and that the two men worked together to cut a hole in the back of the safe.
Smith said that, under Walker’s instructions, he loaded the guns onto the truck, helped him take the weapons to his boat in the marina and then helped him dump the empty safe off of a bridge into the river. He said Walker gave him $4,100.
During cross-examination, White suggested that Smith threatened Walker. He sought to discredit the witness by pointing to previous arrests on assault, theft and burglary charges.
Walker disputed Smith’s account. He testified that Smith came to his house in the middle of the night acting “absolutely bizarre” and that it was his idea to steal the guns. He said he agreed to go with Smith to the hunting camp and did help him load the safe onto the truck. He said it was Smith who had the blowtorch and used it to open the safe. He said Smith grabbed a $100 bill and an envelope with $4,000 that came out of the safe.
Ambrose testified that Walker asked him to drive him to Talladega to sell some guns. He said he agreed but found that Walker instead stopped at a Lowe’s store and bought a Dremel tool before driving to Dog River Marina.
Ambrose, 29, testified that Walker used the Dremel tool to shave off the serial numbers on the long guns. Ambrose said that at one point, Walker said he had to go pick up his mother and asked him to finish shaving off the numbers and then polish the guns and put them in bubble wrap.
Later, Ambrose said, Walker had him move the wrapped guns from the boat to another vessel. He said Walker gave him $100.
After both men had been arrested, Ambrose said, Walker tried to get him lie about the incident.
“He wanted me to take full responsibility,” he said.
Walker testified that he asked Ambrose only to clean up the guns so they would be in good shape to return to Boykin. He testified that he never meant for Ambrose to grind off the serial numbers.
“He wasn’t clear what I was telling him to do,” he said.
DuBose said she found Ambrose’s version more credible. She said her intent was for the defendant to serve the 23-month sentence recommended by prosecutors. To achieve that, she sentenced him to the time he has been jailed since his arrest in order to get him into state custody to serve the balance of a 10-year sentence after a judge revoked his probation after his arrest on the federal charge.

‘Shamefully stupid decision’
Boykin’s mother, two family friends and the director of Serenity Care testified on his behalf.
White said his client was wrong to take possession of the stolen guns. But he said Walker went to his mother’s house to deliver the guns and alert his uncle. Without Walker’s actions, White said, law enforcement investigators may never have solved the crime.
“Everything leading up to it, not real good. Bad judgment on his part,” he said. “But we have to give him some sort of credit for his actions after the burglary.”
Walker, himself, expressed contrition. “I’ve made a shamefully, shamefully stupid decision,” he said.
But Detective Brian Myles, of the Mobile County Sheriff’s Office, testified that Boykin’s daughter told him that Walker told her that he wanted a $10,000 reward for returning the guns. He Boykin had $70,000 in cash, gold coins, 17 long guns and four pistols in the safe.
Boykin got back most of the coins, all of the guns and $28,000 that investigators found in a chest drawer in Walker’s home. Walker disputed that. He said he had hidden the money in the wall behind a piece of wood that he pointed out to the officers.
DuBose did not appear inclined to give Walker any credit for taking the guns to his mother’s home.
“Apparently, you were trying to give them back for a price,” she said. “I don’t find that admirable.”
Boykin’s son, Gunn Boykin, said he was glad his 92-year-old father did not have to come to court.
“This has been mentally and emotionally draining for him,” he said.

£40,000 worth of jewels stolen in raid on Salts Mill shop

Malcolm Gray inside the Salts Mill shop  
Malcolm Gray inside the Salts Mill shop
An angry businessman said he wanted to “throttle” the thieves who stole “between £30,000 and £40,000“ worth of antique jewellery in a raid in Saltaire.
The raiders squeezed through a tiny window to strike at Carlton Fine Art and Antique Centre, Salts Mill, at some point between 5pm on Wednesday and 10am yesterday.
Proprietor Malcolm Gray, who rents out cabinet space in the centre to dealers, said the burglars targeted seven cabinets in particular, fleecing one of about £15,000 worth of jewellery alone.
AdChoices
The centre is on the second floor of the mill, said Mr Gray, who added: “They climbed onto the roof to get to my premises then broke in through a window to get in.
“It is a tiny window – about 17 inches by 11 inches.”
Mr Gray, 69, continued: “They have taken between £30,000 and £40,000 worth of jewellery – the majority of it was rings. Some bracelets, necklaces and brooches have gone as well.
“They have targeted seven cabinets in all. None of my stuff has gone, but one dealer’s cabinet has been emptied of £15,000 worth of rings, some of them diamond rings.
“They have been very selective in what they have targeted.”
He added: “I would throttle them.”
Mr Gray said whoever broke in had cut themselves on the window in the process, leaving behind DNA evidence for police.
He added: “They had to somehow get onto the roof of the mill, they have got to climb a drainpipe.
“Clearly they have targeted it and looked for a vulnerable point, which they have found and which we didn’t know we had.”
Mr Gray said it was Newark antiques fair yesterday and that the raiders could have targeted the goods with one eye on selling them at the fair.
Mr Gray said he has traded as an antiques dealer in Saltaire for 25 years and not once has his business in the mill been hit.
“It is so unexpected with my position,” he said.
A spokesman for West Yorkshire Police said: “Police were called at about 10am to a report of a burglary at an antiques dealers in the Salts Mill in Saltaire.
“It is believed the offence took place overnight and a number of antiques and jewellery have been reported stolen.

Appeal after Huntingdonshire antiques thieves strike

A desperate appeal has been made for the return of jewellery and antiques stolen in a break-in at a house in Huntingdonshire.
The property, worth thousands of pounds, is said to be of great sentimental value to its owners.
Burglars forced their way into the house in Fenton Road, Fenton, near Warboys, between 1.45pm and 3.30pm on August 13.
They took property including a distinctive Cloisonne carriage clock, a silver spoon and fork christening set with a birch leaf pattern, a set of silver grapefruit spoons, an amethyst and diamond necklace and earrings, a gold pendant, a gold bracelet, a kings pattern silverware set, a Dell laptop and a Samsung tablet.
PC Mark Joslin said: “Many of the items are antiques and hold sentimental value to the victim.
“They are desperate for the items to be returned and I would urge anyone who is offered these items to call police.”

Monday, August 19, 2013

Stolen Art Watch, Christopher Marinello Demonstrates Art Loss Register's New Ethical, Noble & Moral Compass, No Fee For Recovery, Second Time in 2013, Marinello Leads By Example !!


RARE, STOLEN, 16TH CENTURY ASTROLABE TO BE RETURNED TO SWEDISH MUSEUM
  
 Christopher A. Marinello holds the recovered Astrolabe which will be returned to Skokloster Castle in a small ceremony on 21st August 2013

It has been a good year for Swedish Museums.  A few months after recovering Matisse's "Le Jardin" for Stockholm's Museum of Modern Art, Christopher A. Marinello, a lawyer who specializes in recovering stolen artwork, is returning to Sweden with a 16th Century astrolabe stolen from a castle museum in 1999.

Recovered Astrolabe   
Recovered: Astrolabe
Martinus Weiler, silvered brass
diameter 170 mm, depth 4 mm

The Astrolabe, signed by Martinus Weiler and dated 1590, can be classified as an early "astronomical computer" used to tell time and to map celestial objects. It is valued at over $400,000.

The Astrolabe was stolen from Skokloster Castle, one of the world's greatest baroque castles near Arlandal, Sweden.  In the late 1990's and early 2000's the museum suffered a series of thefts of small objects including a rare book.  The thefts were reported to INTERPOL and the Art Loss Register in London but no one was ever arrested for the crime. 

Authorities suspect the notorious "KB man", a former head of the rare books department at Sweden's Royal Library, who admitted stealing millions of dollars worth of rare books and manuscripts from Swedish museums from 1986-2004.  At the time of his arrest in 2004, KB told police that he quickly sold the stolen items to support his lifestyle of Armani suits, Cuban cigars, and Mercedes Benzes.   A few weeks after his arrest and subsequent divorce, KB man committed suicide by cutting the gas line in his apartment, slitting his wrists, and then igniting the gas.  The resulting explosion blew out the walls of his apartment forcing evacuation of his neighbours and causing a dozen serious injuries.

Astrolabe back    
Recovered: The Astrolabe is insribed on the back
 'Martinus Weiler islebiensis me fecit anno 1590'
  
Mr. Marinello, works closely with law enforcement and the Art Loss Register, a database of stolen objects based in London.  The astrolabe was being searched by a collector from Italy who had intended to offer it for sale in London.  Once located, Marinello negotiated the return of the astrolabe with the lawyer for the Italian collector.  He expects to return the work to Skokloster Castle later this week.

"While a 16th Century astrolabe may not be as 'sexy' as a major Picasso or Matisse, for a geek like me, recovering such an important planespheric and horological instrument is just as gratifying" said Marinello.

Bengt Kylsberg, the Musuem's Curator commented, "Skokloster Castle is very grateful to Christopher Marinello and The Art Loss Register for their fantastic work.  This instrument is an important part of our collection and has been at Skokloster Castle for more than 300 years.  With this recovery, our scientific and rare instrument collection is nearly as complete as it was when Gustaf Wrangel, the founder of Skokloster Castle, died in 1676."

- STOLEN -

Stolen: Inclinometer

A gilt brass inclinometer signed by Johann Freidrich Franck and dated 1643 was also stolen from the castle and remains missing.  Anyone with information on the whereabouts of this object is urged to contact:

Bengt Kylsberg, Curator    Christopher A. Marinello
        Skokloster Castle                       The Art Loss Register
      +46 (0)8-402 30 74                      +44 (0) 7702 206 913

Note to editors:
The Art Loss Register (ALR) was established in 1991 by members of the art trade and insurance industry.  The ALR maintains the world's largest international database of stolen, missing and disputed artworks which at present lists over 350,000 registered objects. The ALR specialises in art recovery, expert investigations, complex negotiation and mediation of art related disputes.  More information on the ALR can be found at www.artloss.com. If you have any questions or information regarding stolen artwork, you can contact the ALR on: +44(0)207 841 5780 or via: info@artloss.com.

Works of art worth over €300,000 stolen from Pharos warehouse

Works of art worth over €300,000 stolen from Pharos warehouse
By George Christou
MODERN works of art worth €340,000 were stolen from a warehouse used by the Pharos Arts Foundation, on Nicosia’s Green Line.
Among the items stolen were three metal tables and a wrought-iron door by well-known British artist Richard Wentworth valued at about €20,000 each. He had exhibited the tables and door as well as at an exhibition at the Pharos Centre of Contemporary Art in 2007.
The theft was reported by the President of the Foundation Garo Keheyan who had gone to the warehouse on Monday with a removal crew to move cases containing art items. He found the cases prised open and the contents missing.
Police investigations have so far yielded nothing, even though speculation suggested that the thieves had broken into the warehouse looking for scrap metal, which has become a valuable commodity in these recession-hit times as it is easy to sell.
There were significant amounts of scrap metal that were part of art installations stored in the warehouse which is situated on Ermou Street, bordering the buffer zone in old Nicosia. Art would be sold as scrap metal.
Ironically, artists like Wentworth, who had visited Cyprus several times, would take discarded objects and turn them into art objects, which could now be sold as scrap by the kilo.
A sledgehammer, found in a neighbouring garden and believed to have been used by the thieves to make a big hole in the back of the warehouse, was part of an art installation. It was taken by police for forensic tests.
The thieves had smashed a hole in the wall at the back of the building to get in and removed sheets of corrugated iron from the roof (perhaps to sell as scrap) in order to remove some of the art items that were bulky and heavy.
This was how they walked away with a 3×1 metre wooden frame with glass and other large-sized items. They had also demolished the mezzanine at the back of the building.
Many of the items, like the Wentworth tables, belonged to the artists and were with the Pharos Centre of Contemporary Art on consignment.
Keheyan expressed shock at what had happened. He said: “It is so sad that people on this island are resorting to theft as a way of making a living.”
Two large art items that were not deemed valuable enough by the thieves and were left behind had been used to cover a gap in the barrier-fence on the Green Line. A neighbour had found them discarded and used them to close the gaps in the barrier.
The items on chipboard, which the thieves snubbed and the neighbour used as a barrier against the Turks, were by the renowned, late, Armenian artist Marcos Grigorian, who has work on display at the Museum of Modern Art in New York.

Jasper Johns Assistant Charged With Stealing the Artist’s Work

Jasper Johns, center, with his assistant, James Meyer, right, and an unknown associate in 1989. 
Hans Namuth/Hans Namuth Estate Jasper Johns, center, with his assistant, James Meyer, right, and an unknown associate in 1989.
In the 27 years that James Meyer worked for the Pop Art master Jasper Johns, the assistant answered the artist’s phone, stretched his canvases, bought his paintbrushes and even drew lines on his canvases.
During the time they sat together in Manhattan, St. Maarten and most recently in Sharon, Conn., Mr. Johns mentored his apprentice, teaching him how to construct a work of art, how to trace and reuse his drawings, and the technique of painting with thick drops of hot wax, known as encaustic. “Most important,” Mr. Meyer once said, was that “Jasper has taught me to think about what I’m making before I make it.”
On Wednesday, Mr. Meyer was arrested for stealing at least 22 works from his employer and selling them through an unnamed New York gallery for $6.5 million, falsely telling the dealer and buyers that Mr. Johns had given them to him as presents and that they would be in the official compendium of the artist’s work, known as the catalogue raisonnĂ©. Mr. Meyer kept $3.4 million of that, according to the indictment, with purchasers agreeing to keep the art private for at least eight years, without exhibiting or reselling it.
Arraigned in a Hartford courtroom, Mr. Meyer pleaded not guilty to federal charges, and was released on an unsecured $250,000 bond.
An artist himself, Mr. Meyer, now 51, has talked about how lucky he was to find himself working with one of the greatest American artists of the 20th century. In an unpublished interview from the 1990s with the writer Matthew Rose, Mr. Meyer recounted how he made a cold call to Mr. Johns’s studio in 1984, when he was 22 and painting knockoffs of van Gogh and Matisse at $6 an hour to hang on the walls of Beefsteak Charlie’s.
With his rĂ©sumĂ© and slides of his work in hand, Mr. Meyer said, “I put on a suit, too, and went over to Johns’s Houston Street studio — this large old bank building — tapped on the door.”
Though he didn’t get through the front entrance, he dropped off his package. When he returned the next day to retrieve his slides, Mr. Johns opened the door and invited him in for coffee.
“Come back tomorrow and we’ll take it day by day,” Mr. Meyer remembered Mr. Johns saying. He said that he sometimes drew lines on Mr. Johns’s canvases, which the artist would later erase and redraw. According to the indictment, while employed at the Johns art studio, Mr. Meyer also “maintained a file drawer containing pieces of art that were not yet completed,” and began removing the works from September 2006 to February 2012.
In 2011 Mr. Meyer had a show of his own work — figurative ink drawings on Mylar — at Dorfman Projects, a gallery on West 20th Street in Chelsea. An owner of the gallery, Fred Dorfman, did not immediately return a call seeking comment.
Mr. Meyer, with other artists, has helped develop an art studio at a high school near his home in Salisbury. He lives with his wife, Amy Jenkins, in a house with peeling paint and a rusted and dented mailbox. A woman who answered a knock on the door said she had no comment.
Mr. Johns, now 83, is probably best known for his collage and encaustic paintings of the American flag, one of which hangs in the fourth-floor gallery of the Museum of Modern Art.
An assistant at Mr. Johns’s studio in Sharon said the artist had no comment on Mr. Meyer. The charges include one count of interstate transportation of stolen property, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, and one count of wire fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.
Last year the foundry owner Brian Ramnarine, who created a wax cast of the mold for Mr. Johns’s 1960 metallic collage “Flag,” was charged with using the artist’s original mold to make a bronze sculpture that he attributed to Mr. Johns — and trying to sell it for $11 million.
Carol Vogel contributed reporting from London, Kristin Hussey from Sharon, Conn., and Randy Kennedy from New York.

Medieval panels stolen from Devon church

Thieves snatch two saints and damage a third from the 15th-century rood screen at Holy Trinity, Torbryan

The late 15th-century rood screen before and after the theft
The Henrician and Cromwellian iconoclasms destroyed most British medieval religious art, making any survivals very precious. The theft last month of two panels from the rood screen in the church of Holy Trinity, Torbryan, Devon, is, therefore, a major tragedy for the art world.
The stolen panels show St Victor of Marseilles and St Margaret of Antioch. The thieves also damaged a neighbouring panel of a female saint.

The oak rood, otherwise intact, was constructed and painted between 1460 and 1470, and the artistry is of a very high quality. The church is in the care of the Churches Conservation Trust (CCT), a national charity that aims to protect historic churches at risk.

$5M in art and jewels stolen from San Diego home

 

SAN DIEGO (KSWB/CNN) - Crooks stole millions of dollars in art and jewelry from a home near San Diego. Now, police are now asking for the public's help to find those responsible.
Fine artwork and jewelry worth $5 million was stolen out of a Rancho Santa Fe home.
"From approximately June 17 to approximately until the morning hours 6 am approximately June 18 several paintings, high-end paintings, pieces of artwork, sculptures were taken from the residence," said Det. Brett Garrett.
The thieves took 11 paintings including prints by Claude Monet and Camille Pissarro valued at more than $1 million. The burglars also made off with 20 sculptures worth $3 million and four elaborate diamond, gold, and tourmaline necklace and bracelet sets each worth about $100,000.
Garrett says they need the public's help.
"Should those items go to market in an attempt to be sold, it would be our hope that there's somebody out there who would see these," he said.
The thieves may have a hard time unloading the fine art. Experts say the internet has made it difficult to resell stolen items. Popular web sites like LiveAuctioneers.com and Art Loss Register give law enforcement an online archive of what's being sold and its history.
"If it is sold, it's going to be sold for pennies on the dollar and most art sales these days are on the internet because it increases your visibility, everything is done by the light of day so it's making it much harder for art thieves to sell their property," said Steven Demers, vice president of Kaminski Auctions.
Jewelry is a different story. It's a lot harder to track because metals can be melted down and jewels can be sold separately.
"Just as we get better, criminals get better at where to sell their items without being identified so it's a constant game of cat and mouse unfortunately," said Garrett.

Sotheby's London Auctions Off Stolen Renoir Painting


(Photo: REUTERS/ DG/CP)
(Photo: REUTERS/ DG/CP)

Japanese cops notorious in art world for neglecting to report thefts in international databases

Stolen Renoir illustrates police failure

A painting by Pierre-Auguste Renoir sold in February at Sotheby’s auction house in London for a little more than £1 million (around ¥150 million).
The price set no records and the work is not especially famous, but what has now made this sale notable is that the painting appears to have been stolen from a Japanese collector more than 10 years ago.
In August 2000 the unnamed collector told the police that Renoir’s “Madame Valtat” and five other expensive paintings had been stolen from his residence. Little was heard about the stolen paintings until “Madame Valtat” was listed for a Feb. 5 auction of impressionist art.
Sotheby’s said by email that inquiries had been made to the seller regarding acquisition of the painting and that the seller “provided representations and warranties that they were the rightful owner of the property and that it could be sold free from any third-party claims.”
Sotheby’s also said it was in discussions with the parties involved but refused to disclose whether police authorities were a part of these discussions.
Despite checks that have been put in place to prevent stolen art from slipping through the net, it appears the painting was not placed on global stolen art registers such as those compiled by Interpol and the Art Loss Register, a private organization funded in part by auction houses and insurance companies that specializes in tracking and mediating cases of stolen art.
According to the ALR’s chief investigator, Christopher Marinello, failing to register on these databases makes it much more difficult to keep track of stolen art because auction houses such as Sotheby’s and Christie’s often rely on items being registered when carrying out their checks.
Marinello said Japan in particular is behind the curve in sharing information about stolen art.
Some 270,000 items are listed on the ALR’s register, which includes information from Interpol and the FBI’s stolen art databases. Around 400 Renoir items alone are on the register. Overall, it sees approximately 10,000 new items listed each year. Only 31 items, however, have been listed from Japan, which Marinello described as “one of our weakest areas.”
He said the issue stems partly from language and time zone differences, but he also suggested that Japanese police could do more.
“There is a language difference, but in today’s world that shouldn’t make much of a difference,” he said.
“Police forces all over Japan should be reporting works of art to Interpol at the very least and a private central database of stolen art that will actively check the marketplace to locate the items.”
Marinello noted that despite the minimal number of items registered from Japan, Japanese collectors who had listed with the ALR had been “very successful” in recovering their stolen items.
The ALR sifts through listings from auctions and fairs around the world in the hunt to track down stolen items, and although recovery rates are not especially high — 5 to 10 percent — Marinello believes this rate is improving due to an increasing number of listings being posted on the Internet.
Items can often be recovered many years after the theft, with some pieces being recovered 25 years after the initial loss. But for Marinello the key to successful recovery is making sure stolen items are listed quickly. He said it becomes difficult for police to make arrests in older cases where statutory limitations may come into play and witnesses may have disappeared.
While Marinello believes that the Japanese police could be more proactive in listing stolen artwork, he also feels the ALR could also do more to advertise its services in Japan and other parts of Asia.
He hopes that in the future, he can help to spread the word in this region through seminars and other events.

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Stolen Art Watch, Kunsthal Museum Art Heist, Did They, Or Did They Not, That Is The Question?



Dutch art theft suspects offer paintings for deal

Suspects in the theft of seven artworks have offered to return them in exchange for moving their trial from Romania to the Netherlands, their lawyers say.
The deal was offered by Radu Dogaru and five other suspects as they went on trial, one in absentia, in Bucharest.
They are accused of stealing masterpieces, by Picasso, Gauguin and Monet among others, from Rotterdam's Kunsthal museum last October.
There were fears that some of the paintings had been destroyed.
The remains of paint, canvas and nails consistent with those of the famous works were found in the oven of Olga Dogaru, mother of Mr Dogaru, at her Romanian home in February.
She had confessed to burning an unspecified number of paintings, although later retracted her statement.
Forensic experts have so far refused to say definitively whether or not the burnt remains were from the stolen paintings.
Lightening raid The trial of Radu Dogaru and his five alleged accomplices - one of whom is still on the run - was opened and adjourned by the Romanian court until 10 September.
One of the lawyers said their clients had offered to return five of the paintings, with no mention made of the remaining two.

Another lawyer, Maria Varsii, said: "It is more likely the paintings are intact. My client says they can be handed over to the Dutch authorities. In exchange, they want to go on trial in the Netherlands."
The works have been valued at around 18m euros (£15m; $24m) although they were previously said to be worth as much as 200m euros.
They include Monet's Waterloo Bridge, Picasso's Harlequin Head, Matisse's Reading Girl in White and Yellow and Lucien Freud's Woman with Eyes Closed.
The works were taken from the museum through a back entrance in a pre-dawn raid that lasted less than three minutes.
It was the Netherlands' biggest art theft since 20 works disappeared from Amsterdam's Van Gogh museum in 1991.
The Rotterdam paintings came to light some months later when Mariana Dragu, an art expert at Romania's National Art Museum, was asked by a friend to examine some artworks he was planning to buy.
She said she called the prosecutor's office when she realised she was looking at the stolen originals.
A few months later, three Romanian men were arrested on suspicion of involvement, including Radu Dogaru.
It was following her son's arrest that Mrs Dogaru allegedly burned the artworks at her home in the village of Carcaliu, in the Danube Delta region of eastern Romania.

Artwork stolen from Kunsthal museum

Monet's Waterloo Bridge

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Stolen Art Watch, Cannes Diamond Heist, Why So Little Is Ever Recovered, Ask Oleg Deripaska, Nat Rothschild, Vladimir Putin, Lord Peter Mandelson & Nicholas Sarkozy




With the media abuzz about the Cannes diamond heist Art Hostage can reveal why so little of the haul is ever recovered. Back in 2009 it came to the attention of Art Hostage that whilst the Russian Billionaire Oleg Deripaska and his sidekick Nat Rothschild were holidaying in Montenegro aboard the Deripaska Yacht, Queen K, dear old Oleg bought a collection of stolen Patek Philippe watches and jewels from a certain senior Pink Panther in a Montenegro nightclub. Oleg and Nat had invested $500 million in the Porto Montenegro marina development.

Oleg then took these stolen items aboard his yacht and gave one of the Patek Philippe watches to Lord Peter Mandelson, his guest on the yacht and that was that. Subsequently Lord Peter Mandelson was wearing the Patek Philippe watch and it stopped so he dispatched his Brazilian partner to a Vienna jewelers, which was also an outlet for Patek Phillipe watches and asked them to repair the watch. 

The dealers sent the Patek Philippe watch to Patek Phillipe headquarters for repair but was astonished to learn that the said watch was listed as being stolen during an armed robbery by the infamous Pink Panthers. Frantic with worry Lord Peter Mandelson contacted his close friend Billionaire Oleg Deripaska, who in turn dispatched a top Vienna lawyer to sort out this mess and a cover up ensued, with the stolen Patek Philippe watch in question being confiscated by Swiss Police officer from Geneva Yan Glassey, who was investigating the antics of the Pink Panthers.
Back-story below:

The Mafia paradise that holds secret to tycoons' alliance

By Richard Pendlebury and Neil Barnett

Springtime in Brussels and a familiar figure is wreathed in smiles as he announces his latest diplomatic masterstroke.

After three years of talks Peter Mandelson, the EU Trade Commissoner, has secured a bilateral agreement with the tiny Adriatic nation of Montenegro.

'Today's signature is an important milestone,' he cooed. Montenegro's progress towards becoming a reliable world trading partner had been 'remarkable'.
'Future Monaco': The port of Tivat in Montenegro is going to be transformed into the 'Monaco of the Adriatic'

'Future Monaco': The port of Tivat in Montenegro is going to be transformed into the 'Monaco of the Adriatic' and has a tight circle of wealthy backers
Even so, one imagines that Montenegrin trade prospects rarely dominate small talk at the world's most glamorous restaurants. But they might well have done so at the Moscow dinner table we know Mandelson to have shared with his good friend, Oleg Deripaska, only a few weeks before the Brussels' announcement in April.
Or, indeed, on any of the other occasions when the commissioner has broken bread with the Russian and their mutual friend  -  and Deripaska's business partner and adviser  -  the British financier, Nat Rothschild.
Why? Because Deripaska, Russia's wealthiest man, is also the single largest private employer of Montenegro's 680,000 population, responsible for half of the nation's legitimate economic output.
Rothschild  -  who this week caused a political firestorm by accusing Geroge Osborne, the Tory Shadow Chancellor, of soliciting a £50,000 donation from Deripaska  -  also has a stake in one of the Russian's projects in Montenegro, as well as other heavy business links with him.
nat-rothschild.jpg
Oleg Deripaska

Tycoon alliance? Nat Rothschild (left) has a stake in one of Oleg Deripaska's projects in Montenegro

Indeed, this unholy alliance may very well be the key to understanding Rothschild's astonishing betrayal of his old university chum, Mr Osborne.
BUT why has a tiny state like Montenegro assumed such importance to Deripaska and his business partners? It is no secret that the country has a significant and well-established black economy. As one Balkan business analyst said: 'It is the one country in the region that isn't just bedevilled by corruption, it's a kleptocracy.'
Montenegro, which broke from a federal union with Serbia two years ago, has been governed by prime minister Milo Djukanovic since 1991.

Djukanovic is an interesting character. He had long been ' tolerated' by the West for opposing the regime of late Serbian tryrant Slobodan Milosevic. But allegations of links to hugely profitable, mafia-run tobacco smuggling between his country and the EU have seen him repeatedly investigated by Italian prosecutors.
If Djukanovic is the political leviathan of this tiny state, then his friend Deripaska, similarly tainted by alleged mafia-links, is his economic equivalent.
It is said that Djukanovic personally handled the controversial sale of Montenegro's most important state-owned industrial asset  -  the KAP aluminium firm  -  to a subsdidiary of Rusal, Deripaska's aluminium concern.
Rusal is the world's largest producer of the metal and benefited greatly from two EU aluminium import tariff cuts which were made while friend Mandelson was trade commissioner.
Some say that KAP was considerably underpriced. There are whispers of kickbacks.
Others resent the way in which Russia has taken such a huge stake in their country.
Since 2001 Russia has commanded first place in the countries investing in Montenegro.

Investor: Lord Rothschild, father of Nat, is also on board for the Porto Montenegro marina development near the town of Tivat

Investor: Lord Rothschild, father of Nat, is also on board for the Porto Montenegro marina development near the town of Tivat
Tourism from Russia has rocketed, too. But the main source of investment in recent times has been in real estate, mostly along the gorgeous Adriatic coast.
There are those cynics who say that much of the Russian property investment is a money laundering operation by criminal elements from the Russian Federation.
Of course, there is no suggestion that this might explain Mr Deripaska's interests in the region.
But there is undoubtedly one project for which he has particularly-high hopes  -  or at least had before the credit crunch shrank his  £14billion fortune. That is the extraordinary Porto Montenegro marina development near the town of Tivat.
It is often said of Monaco that it's 'a sunny place for shady people'. Given the identities of some of its recent investors, much the same could be said of the beautiful Montenegran coast.
But at Tivat they really are going to build what has been billed 'the Monaco of the Adriatic'. A Four Seasons hotel is part of the multi-billion-pound plan, as well as hundreds of luxury appartments and berthing for 800 boats  -  150 of them superyachts.
Once again prime minister Djukanovic was personally involved in the negotiations, which saw an abandoned ex-Yugoslav naval base and dockyard sold to foreign investors in early 2006. Once again there were allegations of underpricing.
The yard was bought by a firm called TriGranit, Hungary's biggest property developer. It is co-owned by a Hungarian-born Canadian billionaire named Peter Munk and Nat Rothschild.
Munk, 80, is owner of Barrick Gold, the world's largest gold producing company. He was advised to invest in Montenegro by the Rothschild family, with whom he has long enjoyed business ties.
Then he made a call to Deripaska. 'Oleg made the first phone call to the prime minister (Djukanovic) and opened the door for me,' Mr Munk explained.
But Munk and Rothschild were not alone in the project. Also on board are Nat's father Lord Rothschild and two other business big names. One, Bernard Arnault, the chairman of luxury goods conglomerate LVMH, adds lustre.
The other  -  Deripaska himself  -  adds a blizzard of cash and a warship-sized yacht, the 283ft Queen K, which has been the subject of recent notoriety as a honeypot for Britain's political elite.
Work on the Montenegrin project is already well under way. Giant palm trees have been brought in from Spain, the pier fenders are lined with African teak and fountains made from Venezuelan stone tinkle prettily.
Porto Montenegro should open for business next year. PM Djukanovic hopes that he can persuade the EU to accept Montenegro as a member by 2012, which should help the Tivat development considerably.
Certainly, its tight circle of wealthy backers have much at stake. Munk sits on the international advisory board of Rusal, Deripska's metals giant. Nat Rothschild (whose JNR firm advises Deripaska) sits on the equivalent board at Barrick Gold.
In return, Munk has reportedly invested heavily in Nat Rothschild's New Yorkbased Atticus hedge fund.
How very cosy. But this nexus of tens of millions of pounds of wealth has been much reduced in recent weeks and is still precarious, thanks to the world financial downturn. Fear stalks the oligarch mansions.
Even Deripaska is reportedly struggling to meet debt repayments on a part of his metals empire and will have to liquidate assets.
In this fraught enviroment, George Osborne  -  the Shadow Chancellor  -  made a stupid misjudgment.
He chose to score a cheap political point by leaking embarrassing remarks about Peter Mandelson  -  the same Commisioner Mandelson who had so enthusiastically praised Montenegrin economic progress and had shown a liking for tariff cuts.
And by so doing, Osborne also unwittingly shone an unwelcome light on Mr Rothschild's most important business partner, Mr Deripaska.
So Rothschild went on the attack. When business is this stormy, you have to choose your place of shelter. And Rothschild's was the Porto Montenegro connection.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1080171/The-Mafia-paradise-holds-secret-tycoons-alliance.html#ixzz2aXdDScGd
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Nat & Oleg’s Billionaire’s Ball


Montenegro made strides in its bid to become the new Monaco with the recent 40th birthday bash of Billionaire banking heir Nat Rothschild, which stretched over three days. While the guest of honor and a dozen others arrived by private jet, including a 737 that flew in from the UAE, Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska made the biggest splash – literally – with his $150 million yacht the Queen K (above). Built by Lurssen in 2004, the 238-ft. megayacht has luxury accommodations for 18 along with a crew of 21. Stunning Russian model Sasha Volkova stood out among a large collection of eye candy.
The UK papers report that palm trees from Uruguay were flown in for the main event, billed as a “Disco Soiree” for 300 guests, held around a newly-built, 215ft-long infinity pool at a marina in Porto Montenegro, where Rothschild & Deripaska are joint investors. More than £500 million worth of superyachts filled the harbour, and though none were as impressive as Oleg’s, Canadian gold mining billionaire Peter Munk’s Golden Eagle ran a close second. Munk had pride of place however having mainly bankrolled the new marina.

Mandy's £21,500 watch: It takes a year to make and drips with gold and diamonds. How VERY New Labour

Peter Mandelson this week reached out to an important bloc of voters in a bravura conference performance. I mean, of course, that hitherto-untapped reservoir of electoral strength; Britain's community of wristwatch enthusiasts.
Through the wonders of high-resolution digital photography, watch lovers were able to see that, as he walked to the conference, Mandelson was wearing a Patek Philippe watch  -  and not just any old Patek Philippe but  -  to give it its full name  -  a Reference 5146 annual calendar in yellow gold with a dark slate grey dial.
How thrilling to see at last a British politician who is unafraid to brandish a watch that takes more than a year to build and which is powered by the legendary self-winding calibre known as 315 S IRM QA LU. Mandelson is wearing a tiny micromechanical marvel painstakingly assembled from 355 minuscule components.
Reassuring price tag: Peter Mandelson models his Patek Philippe Reference 5146 at the Labour Party Conference - a timepiece worth £21,500
Reassuring price tag: Peter Mandelson models his Patek Philippe Reference 5146 at the Labour Party Conference - a timepiece worth £21,500
Patek Philippe makes watches for serious collectors. The company was founded in 1839 and Pateks have been worn by Queen Victoria, Albert Einstein, Duke Ellington and Vladimir Putin. So- called 'God's Banker' Roberto Calvi was wearing one when he was found hanging under Blackfriars Bridge in 1982.
Pateks could not be further from the bling of the MTV generation who favour half a kilo of gold and a few carats of diamonds. Instead, a Patek Philippe has all the traditional qualities you would expect of a Swiss watch: accuracy, discretion and a price tag that is perhaps best described as reassuring.
I've visited its factory in Geneva and, while it retains all the artisan craftsmanship you would associate with a master watchmaker, its technology is extraordinary. The workshops are as clean as an operating theatre.
Some of the watches, the minute repeaters, sound the hours, quarters and minutes. But before the chime is considered acceptable, the company's owner, Philippe Stern, listens individually to each one. To ensure he does not reject too many, a computer programme which mimics his ear listens to the watches first.
Patek Philippe watches start at around £10,000; for this you will get the Aquanaut, made of steel and with a rubber strap, or a manually wound yellow gold Calatrava Ref 5199.
One to watch: A Patek Philippe timepiece as sported by Peter Mandelson at conference this week
One to watch: A Patek Philippe timepiece as sported by Peter Mandelson at conference this week
A watch such as the one worn by Mandelson costs £21,490  -  that's with its crocodile- skin strap fastened with a deployant (folding) buckle that closes with a satisfying snap and displays the discreet company emblem of the Calatrava cross, which Patek borrowed from a military order of 12th-century Spanish knights.
But what exactly do you get for your money? Well, the company prefers you to think of a watch as an investment, which will last generations.
Indeed, in its advertising, Patek makes the claim that you never really own one of its watches  -  you merely look after it for future generations.
The Patek Philippe annual calendar watch that Mandelson wears is so called because it tells the time, the day of the week, the date and the month as well as the phases of the moon; moreover, it is able to discern which months have 30 days and which have 31, so it only needs to be adjusted once a year  -  at the end of 28-day February.
Super-watch little league: French President Nicholas Sarkozy also wears a Patek Philippe timepiece
Super-watch little league: French President Nicholas Sarkozy also wears a Patek Philippe timepiece
Lord Mandelson is not the only European statesman to fall for a Patek. Carla Bruni gave Nicolas Sarkozy a Patek Philippe as her wedding present, and it's a smarter one than Mandelson's  -  it's a perpetual calendar wristwatch as opposed to an annual one; it not only discriminates between long and short months, but also accounts for February and does not even require adjustment during leap years.
But Sarkozy and Mandelson are, in fact, mere bit players in the super-watch league. Back in Thirties, the American art collector and banker Henry Graves Jr. joined battle with the automobile manufacturer James Ward Packard to own the most complicated watch in the world.
He commissioned Patek Philippe to produce a one-off  -  the Supercomplication, a pocket watch of yellow gold which took three years to make, secured Henry Graves victory and became the most expensive timepiece ever when it sold for $11million at auction in December 1999. It is now in the Patek Philippe museum in Geneva.
Patek Philippe's most complicated contemporary wristwatch is the Sky Moon Tourbillon Ref 5002, costing around £700,000 (the price fluctuates according to currency movements).
Consisting of 686 parts, it houses a minute repeater mechanism, a perpetual calendar, and, most striking of all, on the back of the watch, a representation of the heavenly vault in the northern hemisphere.
It shows, among other things, the movements of the moon, the stars, as well as the meridian passages of Sirius and the moon; an extra two hands also show ' sidereal' time, which as the people at Patek Philippe will tell you 'is the period of time between two consecutive passages of a fixed star across a certain meridian  -  its duration averages 23 hours 56 minutes and 4.09892 seconds'; an altogether more elevated system than your common-or-garden 24- hour day.
I find it hard to think of a man who would appreciate this distinction more than Lord Mandelson.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217055/Mandelsons-21-500-watch-It-takes-year-make-drips-gold-diamonds-How-VERY-New-Labour.html#ixzz2aXZ2OhE6
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Former French President Nic Sarkozy is also a fan of Patek Philippe watches and he too has been given some stolen Pink Panther jewels and the irony of this is the former wife of Nic Sarkozy Cecilia Attias  was robbed of her $500,000 jewel collection during a burglary at her apartment back in 2009 and her jewels were never recovered but Nic Sarkozy was offered replacements by the Pink Panthers.

Another tale of stolen Pink Panther jewels was the former Moscow Mayor of 18 years Yuri Luzhkov caught with some stolen diamonds from a Pink Panthers raid he had given to his wifeYelena Baturina and one of his many mistresses, which again, was covered up by authorities. 

Furthermore, some of the other items bought by Olag Deripaska from the senior Pink Panther in the Montenegro nightclub were given to Vladimir Putin as well as a couple of Patek Phillipe watches. Putin then gave some of the diamond jewellery to his wife and also his girlfriend as presents. To this day Vladimir Putin wears the stolen Patek Philippe watches on occasion and this is just one of the reasons why very little stolen Pink Panther jewels and watches ever surface.

The Vladimir Putin Patek Phillipe Watch Collection


Vladimir Putin’s Luxury Watch Collection worth millions of dollars

The whole of Russia stirs after the opposition group Solidarity produced a slick video that begins with a title “Watches of Kleptocrat’, listing President Putin’s ultra-expensive wristwatch collection worth of $700,000. Apparently, the Russian President Vladimir Putin has a reasonably soft spot and affection for luxury watches, but some people are wondering why these exquisite watches have not been hard on his wallet. Poking fun and suggesting this was an evidence of government fraud, the Solidarity video also questions how President Putin could afford to have such a lavish and extravagant watch collection, which actually worth’s six times his official annual salary.

Vladimir Putin’s Luxury Watch Collection worth millions of dollars

In the video, viewers will also find comparison of Vladimir Putin’s watches with President Barack Obama’s watch, which it says is a $200 model made by Jorg Gray, and is actually listed for just $350 on the company’s website, which is found plastered with President Obama’s photos waering it.
Further, a crown jewel appears to be the Tourbograph is a $500,000 exquisite masterpiece produced by German watchmaker A Lange & Sohne. This exotic timepiece boasts gold plated arms, platinum casing, sapphire crystal glass, and a hand-stitched crocodile leather strap. And, the Solidarity video also shows Putin wearing the watch.
The video also showcase Russian President wearing some of the most expensive Patek Philippe watches like the Patek Philippe Perpetual Calender worth of $60,000, an $18,000 Patek Philippe Calatrava, a Breguet Marine worth of $15,000, a $10,500 Blancpain Leman Aqua Lung Grande Date, and $10,000 Blancpain Leman Flyback.
Vladimir Putin’s Luxury Watch Collection worth millions of dollars
Interestingly, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s official salary has been listed as $115,000, almost six times the worth of its watch collection of $700,000. Apart from keeping the watches, Putin is also known for gifting the luxury watches as well, often spontaneously his very own wristwatch.

Vladimir Putin’s Luxury Watch Collection worth millions of dollars
However, this is not the first time when opposite political groups have questioned how some of the affluent and prominent Russians without earning multi-million dollar salaries can afford to wear the expensive watches.

 Patek Philippe Coolness...

Vladimir Putin
President Of Russia

Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar
[Reference 5039]

Many sources have suggested that Russian President, Vladimir Putin is a big watch collector and it has been speculated that he wears multiple Patek Philippe models.

These first two images show Vladimir Putin wearing some kind of annual or perpetual calendar with Patek Philippe design language written all over it.


In the photos above and below he appears to be wearing a yellow gold Patek Philippe watch. Some people have speculated he is wearing a Patek Philippe Reference 5140. The Patek Philippe Reference 5140 replaced the Reference 3940.
One thing is for certain, and that is his watch has dauphine hands, but I somehow can't get past the lugs. They look very skinny to me, and the size of the watch looks smaller than a 5140. I have ruled out the Patek Philippe 3940 because it has wider lugs. 

There is also another interesting question. In the photo above, the watch Putin is wearing is clearly white gold and in the one below it is clearly yellow gold. I believe this means he owns the same Patek Philippe in both white and yellow gold.


Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar
Reference 5039

In the photo below I am certain Vladimir Putin is wearing a Patek Philippe Reference 5039. I think it is possible in the two photos of him above wearing a Patek Philippe, he could very well be wearing the same 5039 pictured below, and it is possible the hobnail bezel detail got knocked-out by the camera angle, lighting conditions and/or lack of resolution. 
The photo below is of a Patek Philippe Reference 5039 in yellow gold. The Reference 5039 has a 240Q caliber movement, and essentially it is identical to a Reference 3940, but with a special rare case that has a hobnail bezel. This watch is magnificently elegant, and has world-leader written all over it.


Here are a several more photos of Russian President, Vladimir Putin wearing his Patek Philippe Reference 5039. This first image of him river rafting while wearing his Patek Philippe ads further confirmation or proof he is indeed wearing a Reference 5039. It is kind of ironic the President of Russia is wearing a super elegant Patek Philippe to go river rafting, but I think it is really cool, and after all there is a sporty elegance to the Reference 5039. This model is waterproof, so why not get it wet.



Vladimir Putin offers to replace 'stolen' Super Bowl ring

Vladimir Putin has offered to have a special ring "with a stone" crafted for the owner of the New England Patriots after he was accused of stealing a £16,000 Super Bowl ring at a business gathering in 2005.

Robert Kraft, left, looks on as Vladimir Putin keeps hold of his Super Bowl winner's ring.
Robert Kraft, left, looks on as Vladimir Putin keeps hold of his Super Bowl winner's ring. Photo: ALEXANDER ZEMLIANICHENKO/AP
The Russian president was responding to a surprise question about the controversy at the St Petersburg Economic Forum, where he was on a panel with German chancellor Angela Merkel.
In response, Mr Putin said he had no recollection of the ring or Robert Kraft, 72, the billionaire owner of the Patriots American football team and one of the biggest US sports tycoons.
The ring changed hands at a business meeting in 2005 when Mr Kraft was visiting St Petersburg with an American delegation. At the time, Mr Kraft said the ring was a gift, but earlier this month he claimed Mr Putin instead pocketed the diamond encrusted ring against his wishes.
"I remember that some kinds of souvenirs were handed out," Mr Putin said.
"If it has such great value for Mr Kraft and for the team," Mr Putin said, "then I will ask our enterprises to make something good, so that it is clear that it is expensive, made of good metal, with a rock – so that this jewel is passed on from generation to generation in the team whose interests Mr Kraft represents."
"I think this will be the most intelligent solution to such a complex international problem," he said with the glimmer of a smile.

President Putin admires the 124 diamond ring. (ALEXANDER ZEMLIANICHENKO/AP)
Mr Kraft told the New York Post earlier this month: "I took out the ring and showed it to [Mr Putin]. And he put it on and he goes, 'I can kill someone with this ring'." "I put my hand out and he put it in his pocket, and three KGB guys got around him and walked out."
A representative of the New England Patriots later said the statement claiming that Mr Putin had stolen the ring was "a joke".
“It’s a humorous, anecdotal story that Robert retells for laughs,” said a spokesman for Mr Kraft's company. “He loves that his ring is at the Kremlin, and, as he stated back in 2005, he continues to have great respect for Russia and the leadership of President Putin.”
The ring is reportedly kept in a Kremlin museum for gifts from foreign dignitaries.

Montenegro is a staggeringly beautiful, mountain statelet on the coast of the Adriatic, only just more than half the size of Wales with a population of 660,000, slightly more than that of Glasgow. It has been an independent state only since 2006, when its people voted in a referendum to sever their union with Serbia. It is probably best known to the British public as the supposed setting of the film Casino Royale, though most of it was actually shot in the Czech Republic.
Uniquely for a sovereign state, Montenegro has no currency. All transactions are conducted in euros though it is not in the EU or the eurozone.
Porto Montenegro is a Luxury yacht marina and adjacent waterfront development currently under construction in Tivat(CAVTAT), Montenegro.

The construction site was a naval shipyard named Arsenal, which fell into disuse after the Yugoslav Wars and the decline of the SFR Yugoslav Navy. The attractive lot on which the shipyard is situated was put on public offering in 2006, and was bought by Canadian businessman Peter Munk Munk, chairman of Toronto-based Barrick Gold Corp. It was acknowledged in 2008 that he was not alone in the venture – while Munk owns 54% of the Porto Montenegro company, the rest is owned by Oleg Deripaska, Nathaniel Rothschild, Jacob Rothschild, Bernard Arnault, Sandro Demijan and Anthony Munk.

Super Yacht Queen K belong to Billionaire Oleg Deripaska

Super Yacht Amadeus belong to Billionaire Bernard Arnault
Another guest of Nat Rothschild

Michael Evans owner of Evans Property Group brought his yacht the White Rose of Drachs

Billionaire Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich was also a guest, had his yacht Luna in nearby port of Dubrovnik
Among the guests was the former prime minister of Montenegro, Milo Djukanovic, who gave the go-ahead to the development a few years ago after flying over the area in a helicopter with Peter Munk, the billionaire head of the world’s largest gold company and the marina’s majority investor.
Guests came from the worlds of fashion, high finance, politics, commodities and even royalty.
They included Lord Mandelson, the former business secretary, who stayed on Sveti Stefan, a fortified 15th century village on an island just down the coast which has been converted into a five-star boutique resort where suites can cost up to 2,500 euros a night.
He rubbed shoulders with Eddie Jordan, the Formula One driver, who owns an apartment overlooking the marina and the Wimbledon tennis champion Novak Djokovic, who has also just bought a luxury flat and keeps a yacht in the marina.
Tamara Mellon, the British co-founder of the Jimmy Choo luxury shoe brand, and Sasha Volkova, Ukrainian supermodel, were also at the party.
The one royal guest was believed to be King Kgosi Leruo Molotlegi, the leader of the 300,000 strong Royal Bafokeng Nation, a semi-autonomous tribal area in South Africa which is rich in platinum – another contact from Mr Rothschild’s interests in minerals.
Another mining billionaire, Robert Friedland of Canada’s giant Ivanhoe Mines, was also on the guest list. His company’s plan to exploit gold and copper deposits in Mongolia’s Gobi desert sparked civil unrest when local groups complained there had been a lack of environmental assessment.
Blackstone billionaire Steve Schwarzman, Princess Firyal of Jordan and billionaire Nicolas Berggruen was also on the guest list.
Egypt’s richest family, the Sawiris, were also there – checking out the competition, in the light of the fact that they are building a £1 billion marina and hotel development on the other side of the Bay of Kotor, one of the largest harbours on the Adriatic coast.
The guest list was meant to be secret but was thought to have included the historian Niall Ferguson and his Dutch-Somali wife, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, members of the Guinness and Goldsmith families, Tony Hayward, the former BP boss whose name was tarnished by the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, Roland Rudd, the head of the public relations firm Finsbury and Princess Florence von Preussen, 27, the great-great granddaughter of Kaiser Wilhelm II, who has an “on and off” relationship with Mr Rothschild.

Hotel Sveti Stefan in Montenegro hosted part of the lavish three-day party

Munk announced that he intends to build a luxury yacht marina and a waterfront community, which would cater to needs of growing community of superyacht owners. The favourable position of Tivat in the secluded part of Bay of Kotor, together with the proximity of Tivat Airport, makes it favourable location for a marina.
The marina will have berths for 650 yachts, 150 of them super yachts, up to 150m long.
The planned waterfront community behind the main docks will feature a 150-room luxury hotel, about 250 condo units, conference centre, a market square, an art gallery, a museum, a sports complex and 10,000 square metres of retail space, including a supermarket and a department store.
Projects related to Porto Montenegro include an 18-hole golf course in the vicinity of Tivat Airport, and a possible acquisition of Bijela shipyard by Peter Munk, which should serve as a yacht maintenance facility.

Defeat for Mandelson's billionaire as judge backs the Mail over story of Rothschild and the Russian oligarch

Billionaire financier Nat Rothschild exposed his friend Peter Mandelson to accusations of a conflict of interest while the Labour peer was an EU trade commissioner, the High Court ruled yesterday.
The Swiss-based hedge-fund manager had launched a libel battle against the Daily Mail over his trips to Moscow and Siberia with Lord (then Mr) Mandelson and a Russian oligarch.
He claimed an article painted him as a ‘puppet-master’ willing to exploit his friendship with the former Labour spin doctor to impress his business associate, metals magnate Oleg Deripaska.
But he lost the case, and photographs of him, Lord Mandelson and Deripaska at an aluminium smelting plant, were ruled by the judge, along with other evidence, to disprove Rothschild's claim that the visit has no business-related purpose. 
Siberian visit: Sebastian Taylor, Peter Munk, Nathaniel Rothschild, pictured centre with Oleg Deripaska, seciond right and Peter Mandelson, far right, during the visit to the Siberia
Siberian visit: Sebastian Taylor, Peter Munk, Nathaniel Rothschild, pictured centre with Oleg Deripaska, second right and Peter Mandelson, far right, during a visit to a Siberian hydro-electric plant
During the court case, a judge heard that 40-year-old Mr Rothschild  flew Mr Mandelson to Moscow in his private jet and that Mr Deripaska’s office arranged an ‘informal meeting’ for him with a Russian finance minister at an exclusive restaurant.
The three men then flew to Abakan in Siberia in Mr Deripaska’s private plane before visiting an aluminium factory at the centre of an EU review.
Mr Rothschild had asked for very substantial damages from Associated Newspapers but a High Court judge yesterday rejected the claim and accepted the Mail’s submission that Mr Rothschild’s conduct was ‘inappropriate in a number of respects.’
Mr Justice Tugendhat said: 'In my judgment that conduct foreseeably brought Lord Mandelson’s public office and personal integrity into disrepute and exposed him to accusations of conflict of interest, and it gave rise to the reasonable grounds to suspect that Lord Mandelson had engaged in improper discussions with Mr Deripaska about aluminium. ‘
In his judgment, Mr Justice Tugendhat referred to photographs taken during the trip to the Siberian plant.
Visit: This photograph of the visit to an aluminium plant in Siberia featuring Lord Mandelson, centre, Oleg Deripaska, second right and Nathaniel Rothschild, far right, was commented on by the judge and was a crucial piece of evidence
Visit: A photograph of the visit to an aluminium plant in Siberia featuring Lord Mandelson, centre, Oleg Deripaska, second right and Nathaniel Rothschild, far right
The judge said: 'I infer from the fact that Lord Mandelson accompanied Mr Deripaska, Mr Munk and Mr Rothschild on a visit to the aluminium smelter, and I find, that they probably talked about aluminium.

'There are photos of their party wearing Rusal’s jackets and safety helmets on their visit to the smelter, and standing with a guide, to whom they appear to be listening.
'It is probable that on a visit to an aluminium smelter and foil plant they talked about aluminium. It does not follow that it is probable that they talked about tariffs on aluminium, and I do not find that they did talk about tariffs.

The Daily Mail story from May, 2010
'Nor do I find that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that Lord Mandelson talked about aluminium tariffs.'

The judge dismissed Mr Rothschild’s assertion that he took the former Labour spin doctor on the trip as a friend and not for any business reason.
He said the financier gave ‘quite unrealistic answers’ when cross-examined over why Mr Deripaska would have obvious reasons for developing a relationship with Mr Mandelson.
Mr Justice Tugendhat said: ‘I cannot accept that Mr Rothschild was unable to foresee this at the time he invited Lord Mandelson on the trip. In my judgment Mr Rothschild did appreciate this at the time.
‘A holder of public office such as a Commissioner is required to make a clear distinction between his public life and his private life.’
Mr Rothschild may not have been aware of the EU Code of Conduct regarding commissioners’ official and private lives, said the judge, but ‘he accepted in cross-examination that a flight from Moscow to Abakan in a private jet is a great luxury and is expensive.
‘He accepted that he understood there is a general principle that people in government have to be very careful about taking substantial benefits from businessmen with interests that may come into their orbit of responsibility.
‘Mr Rothschild was well able to understand this. That is why he put so much stress on the fact that he and Lord Mandelson were friends as the explanation of why he was willing to entertain Lord Mandelson by flying him to Moscow, and then back to Brussels, on his own private plane.

‘I infer that that is why he was reluctant to accept in cross-examination that Lord Mandelson was in fact Mr Deripaska’s guest on the trip from Moscow to Abakan, and not his (Mr Rothschild’s) guest.
Visit: The group are shown round the aluminium plant
Visit: This picture of the group being shown round the aluminium plant was commented on by the judge and was a crucial piece of evidence
‘In my judgment the fact that this had occurred would have been likely to give to Mr Deripaska (and to the public, if they had known about it) the impression that Lord Mandelson would be more favourably disposed to Mr Deripaska than would otherwise have been the case, if and when any question arose in the course of Lord Mandelson’s performance of his official duties which related to any of Mr Deripaska’s businesses.’
‘Further, by facilitating the development of a relationship between Mr Deripaska and Lord Mandelson, Mr Rothschild was, in my judgment, conferring a benefit on, and seeking to please, both Mr Deripaska and Lord Mandelson.
‘So far as Lord Mandelson was concerned the benefit was the trip and the hospitality itself.]
‘So far as Mr Deripaska was concerned it was a relationship with the EU Trade Commissioner. A businessman with such extensive and global interests as Mr Deripaska would be likely to welcome an opportunity to get know a person in Lord Mandelson’s position.’

The judge said Mr Rothschild’s ‘different and developing accounts’ of the purpose of the visit to the plants in Siberia were confusing and the banker ‘ had not been entirely candid.’

He said: ‘That reflected his appreciation that it was foreseeable that this part of the visit, in particular, would expose Lord Mandelson to accusations of conflict of interest, and give rise to reasonable grounds for suspecting that Lord Mandelson had engaged in improper discussions with Mr Deripaska about aluminium.’

In his judgment, the judge stressed that nothing in it should be taken as criticism by him of Lord Mandelson or Mr Deripaska, Russia’s richest man.
Libel action: Nathaniel Rothschild, left, brought the case against the Daily Mail over an article about a meeting he arranged between Lord Mandelson, right and Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska
Libel action: Nathaniel Rothschild, left, brought the case against the Daily Mail over an article about a meeting he arranged between Lord Mandelson, right and Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska
Libel action: Nathaniel Rothschild, left, brought the case against the Daily Mail over an article about a meeting he arranged between Lord Mandelson, right and Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska
Court case: The hearing took place at London's High Court
Court case: The hearings took place at London's High Court
A spokesman for the Daily Mail said: ‘We are pleased with Mr Justice Tugendhat's judgment which  vindicates our reporting of this story.
'He concluded, rightly, that Mr Rothschild placed the reputation of his friend, Mr Mandelson (then the European Trade Commissioner) at risk by inviting him to meet Mr Deripaska in Russia.

'Mr Justice Tugendhat accepted Mr Rothschild's conduct had been "inappropriate in a number of respects" and had "brought Lord Mandelson's public office and personal integrity into disrepute and exposed him to accusations of conflict of interest".
Strong-arm tactics: Rothschild (right) indulges in some horseplay with Mandelson
Strong-arm tactics: Rothschild (right) indulges in some horseplay with Mandelson
'This case is a reminder, at a time when newspapers are under attack for invading privacy, that the rich and powerful regularly use the law to prevent legitimate scrutiny of their activities. Had the Mail lost this case, it could have incurred costs of more than £1million.

'Not many news organisations, however committed they are to free speech, can afford to risk a loss of that magnitude.

'As Lord Justice Leveson’s  Inquiry considers the balance between privacy and freedom of expression, the chilling effect on free speech that court cases like this one  exert needs to be borne in mind.'
Mr Rothschild said he would appeal against the judgment.
Rothschild: The playboy turned hedge-fund king
Even by City standards, the profit was extraordinary. In January, Nat Rothschild secured a £240million windfall from two investments worth just £24million three months earlier.
For the scion of the British banking dynasty it was another spectacular success to add to a fortune estimated in September at £1.13billion.
The Rothschilds have always been about connections. Their wealth derives from lending money and giving advice to kings, queens, emperors, even entire countries.
The future 5th Baron Rothschild is simply following in that tradition  and Oleg Deripaska and Lord Mandelson are the more recent family ‘contacts’.
Born into privilege: Nat Rothschild followed the family tradition
Born into privilege: Nat Rothschild followed the family tradition
He brings together oligarchs, politicians and money men on yachts in the Mediterranean and in vast country mansions.
A glimpse at the guest list for his 40th birthday party last summer at Porto Montenegro illustrated the world of power and influence that Nat moves around, spending 750 hours each year in his private jet.
Those invited to the £1million, three-day extravaganza at the marina billed ‘the Monaco of the Adriatic’ included politicians, industrialists and celebrities –  as well as a smattering of oligarchs and mining magnates.
One guest, Peter Munk, the octogenarian Canadian billionaire who owns the largest gold-mining company in the world and is  Nat’s mentor, says of him: ‘He’s very well  connected. His is probably the biggest brand name in finance. Few people will not take a call from him.’
The youngest of four children and the only boy, the future 5th Baron Rothschild was born into privilege.
After Eton the young Nat went to Oxford, where he became friends with the future Chancellor, George Osborne. He also became infamous for his excesses, becoming a  member of the notorious Bullingdon  Club, the debauched all-male drinking  society with a reputation for wanton vandalism.
With that family name – and fortune –  behind him, there was never any shortage of female admirers and favoured girls would be asked back to his father Jacob’s lavish  country estate, Waddesdon Manor in Buckinghamshire.
To his family’s horror, Rothschild met Kate Moss’s friend, model Annabelle Neilson, on a beach in India and when he was 23 they eloped to Las Vegas and married.
The couple partied hard on both sides of the Atlantic, featuring in glossy magazines as they sunned themselves in the Caribbean. But after three years punctuated by explosive rows, the couple divorced.
Some feared playboy Nat might fall victim to the family curse which saw his cousin, 23-year-old Raphael de Rothschild, collapse and die on a New York pavement from a heroin overdose and another relative, Amschel Rothschild, hang himself in a Paris hotel at the age of 41.
Instead, he stopped drinking and started looking for a job.
First he joined Lazards in the City then returned to New York where he met Tim Barakett, an ambitious twentysomething money-man who wanted to start his own hedge fund, Atticus.
Nat put in his own money to become a  50 per cent partner and began exploiting his family connections to promote the fund, which grew from £60million in assets to a peak of £13billion before it was wound up three years ago.
The tax exile has homes – decorated with artwork by David Hockney – in the Swiss ski resort of Klosters, Manhattan and Paris.
The deal-maker’s circle of powerful men now include some who control large chunks of the natural resources sector, not least his business links with the former Soviet bloc in general – and Oleg Deripaska in particular.
Deripaksa: The tycoon with the £80million yacht
Although Oleg Deripaska was one of the world's richest men, with a fortune estimated at £18bn, in Britain he was barely known until the summer of 2008
Although Oleg Deripaska was one of the world's richest men, with a fortune estimated at £18bn, in Britain he was barely known until the summer of 2008
Although Oleg Deripaska was one of the world’s richest men, with a fortune estimated at £18billion, in Britain he was barely known until the summer of 2008.
Mention of the word oligarch conjured up the name of another super-rich Russian, Chelsea Football Club owner Roman Abramovich.
That instantly changed after the infamous Corfu ‘yachtgate’ scandal when Deripaska found himself at the centre of the political firestorm between Lord Mandelson and shadow chancellor George Osborne.
Details of the private conversations between the two politicians aboard the Russian’s £80million super-yacht, the Queen K, thrust Deripaska – much to his dismay – into the limelight.
Notoriously publicity-shy, he made his fortune in the brutal aluminium wars back in the 1990s when the Soviet Union collapsed.
Like his ultra-loyal special adviser Nat Rothschild, the metal magnate is extremely well connected.
But he bristled when once asked  if he benefited from the relationship with Mandelson, who had overseen EU  metal tariffs.
‘Benefited from friendship?’ he replied indignantly. ‘It’s not my business. Whatever I did in my life, I did myself.’
Like many oligarchs, Deripaska, 44, has humble beginnings and grew up in a Cossack village in southern Russia with his widowed mother.
‘We had no money,’ he says. ‘It was a very practical question every day. How do I get to buy food and keep from starving?’
During the infamous Corfu 'yachtgate' scandal, Deripaska found himself at the centre of a political firestorm between Lord Mandelson and shadow chancellor George Osborne
During the Corfu 'yachtgate' scandal, Deripaska found himself at the centre of a political firestorm between Lord Mandelson and shadow chancellor George Osborne. Details of private conversations between the two politicians aboard the Russian's super-yacht, the Queen K, thrust Deripaska into the limelight
After serving two years in the Strategic Missile Forces, he graduated from Moscow State University with a degree in nuclear physics and set about making his fortune.
With the old state-run industries – oil, gas and aluminium – being ruthlessly carved up, Deripaska was involved in a bitter struggle for a smelting factory in Siberia.
By the early 1990s he had accumulated a 20 per cent stake in the Siberian factory and in 2000 Abramovich bought most of the holdings in Russia’s aluminium industry and merged them with Deripaska’s company to create Rusal – Russian Aluminium.
The Chelsea owner later sold his stake to Deripaska, leaving him the undisputed tsar of one of the world’s most lucrative industries.
Despite losing a gigantic chunk of his fortune in the global financial crisis in 2008, Deripaska survived thanks  to Kremlin help in restructuring debts.
An Anglophile who speaks fluent English, he remains immensely wealthy and amongst his properties is  a £25million house in Belgravia.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2099254/Victory-Daily-Mail-Banker-Nathaniel-Rothschild-loses-libel-action-Lord-Mandelson-meeting-report.html#ixzz2glQ4ew3r
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Cannes watch shop held up days after luxury hotel heist

Armed men have robbed a luxury watch store in Cannes, just three days after jewels worth 103 million euros (£89m) were swiped from a hotel in the Riviera resort.

Carlton Intercontinental Hotel in Cannes
$136 million (£88.7 million) worth of jewels and diamonds were stolen on Sunday from the Carlton Intercontinental Hotel in Cannes Photo: AP
The attack - the latest in a string of gem thefts in recent months – has sparked angry calls for the French government to bolster security in the glitzy port famed for its annual film festival.
At 11am on Wednesday morning, two robbers burst into the Kronometry store on the Croisette – Cannes’ legendary promenade - threatening staff with a grenade and a gun before escaping with dozens of watches.
Police said the value of the items stolen is not yet known and that the culprits may well have got away “on foot”.
The heist came as Cannes is still reeling from Sunday’s robbery at the nearby Carlton Intercontinental Hotel - a record gem theft in France and one of the biggest in recent European history.
In that robbery, a lone thief, armed with a handgun managed to slip through a half-open window into the plush establishment and help himself to 72 pieces of jewellery, including diamond-encrusted necklaces, rings and pendants.
The “apparently well-informed” individual struck as unarmed security men were transferring valuables from a safe to display chests, completing his crime in less than a minute, posing widespread questions about the level of security in the resort.
Wednesday’s robbery is the second in five months at the Kronometry store. In February, burglars took advantage of a staff lunch break to cut a disk-shaped hole into a bay window leading to the store’s internal courtyard, stealing 150 watches worth 1 million euros.
On Wednesday, Cannes’ Right-wing deputy mayor David Lisnard slammed what he called “the disengagement of the state in law enforcement in Cannes” and falling police numbers.
“(The police) clearly no longer have sufficient means and this state failing…is becoming really problematic for our town in terms of security and image, and thus jobs,” said Mr Lisnard on his Facebook page.
But speaking after the Carlton heist, top local government official, Adolphe Colrat, said: "This hold-up is not linked to a problem of public security; one shouldn’t establish a link between this spectacular robbery and a rise in delinquency in Cannes.”
The government prefect for Alpes-Maritimes dĂ©partement said he would push for jewellers in Cannes to create a local equivalent of the so-called “VendĂ´me Committee” – a club of major gem merchants set up in 1936 in Paris’ chic Place Vendome to promote their brands and thwart heist attempts.
Such a committee would “constitute a single point of contact for state administrations and the police,” he said.
Mr Colrat was due to meet management at the Carlton hotel, saying he he would quiz them on “whether sufficient preventative security is in place to exhibit or sell products of such value.”
His comment followed claims by one unionised staff member that hotel management were guilty of “carelessness” in terms of security.
The robberies of the past three days follow a string of other high-profile thefts in the port town.
At this year’s Cannes Film Festival, jewels worth almost £1 million, destined to ornament film stars on the red carpet, were stolen from a Chopard representative’s suite in a Novotel hotel. Less than a week later, a de Grisogono necklace created to mark the Swiss house’s 20th anniversary worth almost £2 million vanished during a festival party at a hotel in nearby Antibes.

VIDEO: Famous violinist ‘elated’ after £1.2m instrument stolen from Euston recovered

A violin worth more than £1.2million which was stolen at Euston station in November 2010 has been safely 

recovered by detetctives. Picture: British Transport Police.  
A violin worth more than £1.2million which was stolen at Euston station in November 2010 has been safely recovered by detetctives. Picture: British Transport Police.


A 300-year-old violin worth £1.2million which was stolen at Euston station in 2010 has been recovered by the British Transport Police (BTP).
 The 1696 Antonio Stradivarius instrument has been verified by antiques expert and can be returned to its owner, internationally renowned musician Min-Jin Kym.
The 35-year-old has spoken of her ‘sheer elation’ when she was given the news by officers last week.
A spokesman for BTP said: “Acting on a line of enquiry, officers recovered the instrument from a property in the Midlands last week, though further details on the recovery cannot be disclosed.”
The instrument, discovered intact with some very minor damage, was recovered in its case along with two missing bows worth £70,000.
The thieves struck at a Pret a Manger café outside Euston station around 9pm on November 29, 2010 as Ms Kym stopped to get something to eat.
Following a public appeal for information and the release of CCTV images on BBC Crimewatch, John Maughan, 32 at the time, and two teenagers were later arrested.
They were sentenced in connection with the theft in 2011 but the violin and bows were never recovered.
Detective Chief Inspector Simon Taylor, who led the hunt, said: “We’re absolutely delighted to have recovered the Stradivarius violin after a long and very complex investigation.
“I always maintained that its rarity and distinctiveness would make any attempt to sell it extremely difficult, if not futile, because established arts and antiques dealers would easily recognise it as stolen property.
Speaking after the instrument’s recovery, Ms Kym said: “It’s been a very difficult journey, I still can’t quite believe what has happened.
“The loss of the instrument, and the acute responsibility I felt, was at the back of my mind at every moment of the day.
“I’d played the instrument since I was a teenager, so it’d been a huge part of my identity for many years.
“The theft was a crushing blow and the detectives in the case had always, quite rightly, been very careful not to give me false hope.
“When they told me the good news, it didn’t feel real.”