Stolen Art Watch, Art Loss Register's Julian Radcliffe, Greedy, Weasal Featured Little Turd in The Spotlight.

 

Tracking Stolen Art, for Profit, and Blurring a Few Lines

"Everyone agrees there’s a real need for this kind of organization," says Julian Radcliffe, owner of the Art Loss Register, a private company that tracks stolen artworks.

 Early in the morning of May 11, 1987, someone smashed through the glass doors of the Museum of Modern Art in Stockholm, removed a Matisse from a wall and fled. 

All it took was daring and a sledgehammer.

The whereabouts of the painting, “Le Jardin,” remained a mystery until the work was found last year and made a celebratory trip hom in January.

But law enforcement played no role. The return was facilitated by the Art Loss Register, a London-based company that over the last two decades has evolved into a little-noticed but increasingly integral part of art investigation around the world.

The brainchild of Julian Radcliffe, an Oxford-educated former risk consultant who speaks of once spying for British intelligence, the Register helps fill a gaping void: billions of dollars’ worth of art is stolen every year, according to an F.B.I. estimate, but law enforcement has too few resources to prioritize finding it.

For Mr. Radcliffe, whose other company helps recover stolen construction equipment, this presented a natural opportunity. Since it began 22 years ago, the Register has developed one of the most extensive databases of stolen art in the world, enabling it to recover more than $250 million worth of art, earning fees from insurers and theft victims.

Along the way, the company has drawn criticism from those who say its hardball tactics push ethical, and sometimes legal, boundaries. Even so, the Register continues to count law enforcement agents among its supporters. “To me, they’re very important, a very useful tool,” said Mark Fishstein, the New York City Police Department’s “art cop.”

Mr. Radcliffe’s company operates in the dim recesses of the art world, where the prevalence of theft, fakery and works of murky provenance has given rise to many businesses that promise to help clients navigate this lucrative but largely unregulated market.

But for the Register, despite its official-sounding name and pivotal role as a monitor, profits have not come easily, and the company’s future looks increasingly cloudy, threatening a core player in the recovery of stolen art.

Mr. Radcliffe said that he hopes the Registry will break even this year, but that it has lost money for the last six and has stayed afloat only thanks to his cash infusions. Now the company is losing talent, too.

During the past year, two key employees resigned; additionally, the company’s general counsel, Christopher A. Marinello, who has been as much a public face of the company as Mr. Radcliffe, says he is leaving at the end of this month, with plans to start a rival business.

Among the incidents that have drawn criticism, the Register misled a client who wanted to check the provenance of a painting before he purchased it, telling him it was not stolen, when in fact it was, so that he would buy it and unwittingly help the company collect a fee for its retrieval.

It has been known to pay middlemen and informers for leads on stolen works, a practice that troubles some in law enforcement, who say that it can incite thefts. And the company often behaves like a bounty hunter, charging fees of as much as 20 percent of a work’s value for its return.

These fees do not bother the insurance companies and other clients that hire the Register to find a work. But the company has approached people and museums with whom it has no relationship. In several cases, people say the Register contacted them, told them of a lead on a stolen work, then refused to divulge any information until the subject agreed to pay a fee.

Officials at the Musée des Beaux-Arts in Orleans, France, for example, said that the Register approached the museum in 2003, asserting that it had information about an Alfred Sisley painting that had been stolen from the museum. The company said it could retrieve the work if the museum agreed to its fee. Unable to afford the payment, the museum called the police instead. The work was never recovered.

“Sometimes we have to deal with the fact that, under French law, we could charge them,” said Corinne Chartrelle, the deputy for a French law enforcement unit that tracks stolen art. She was not involved in the Orleans case, but said she knew of similar instances where the Register had tried to leverage its knowledge to extract a fee.

“They are keeping information to themselves,” she said.

Mr. Radcliffe contests these allegations, noting, for example, that police investigators routinely pay informants, and adding that such disputes are rare but inevitable, given the number of players involved.

“Everyone agrees there’s a real need for this kind of organization,” he said.

Indeed, even some of the company’s harshest critics say they do not welcome the prospect of an art market devoid of the Register and its resources.

“They do serve a purpose — they’re the only private database,” said Robert K. Wittman, a private art investigator who formerly led the F.B.I.’s Art Crime Team. “When they get into trouble is when they overstep that role and try to act as if they’re the police.”

Mr. Radcliffe, who is also a gentleman farmer, shrugs off suggestions that his business could be faltering.

“I am very patient,” he said. “I grow trees. I raise cattle. Breeding cattle takes 20 years. If I think something is the right thing to do, I will do it as long as it takes.”

Few Competitors

Outside the movies, art crime can be awfully mundane.

Rare is a thief like the dapper one played by Pierce Brosnan in “The Thomas Crown Affair,” who choreographed robberies of Monets from the Metropolitan Museum of Art with his bowler-hatted accomplices. Instead, doors are forced, windows smashed and valuables grabbed in a hurry, often by petty criminals.

As clumsy as the crooks might be, the value of stolen art is still huge compared with the law enforcement resources devoted to its recovery.

A few countries, like Italy, place a high priority on art theft, but they are the exception.

New York City and Los Angeles, hubs of the art trade, each have one detective dedicated to art crime. The F.B.I. has assigned 14 agents with special training to investigate art crimes, though most have other duties as well. Scotland Yard’s arts and antiques unit has three officers.

“It’s not violent crime,” said Saskia Hufnagel, a research fellow at the Australian Research Council Center of Excellence in Policing and Security. “There are no victims, at least ones the public would consider victims. A lot of the loss is covered by insurance.”

The authorities are also hobbled by limited and incomplete data.

The database managed by Scotland Yard lists some 57,500 stolen objects. Interpol’s database of stolen art includes about 40,000 works. The F.B.I.’s database has fewer than 8,000 objects on it, partly because the bureau relies on local police to fill in the blanks.

“It is not an absolutely complete database,” said Bonnie Magness-Gardiner, who manages the F.B.I.’s art theft program. “We get what they choose to send us.”

Each database lists items based on individual protocols, and most police agencies don’t communicate with one another; thus, someone checking whether a work is stolen would have to speak to multiple agencies.

The Register, by comparison, reports that its database includes more than 350,000 stolen, looted or missing works. In addition to an in-house staff of about 10, the company uses an Indian company to search the world for matches between the database and items for sale at auction houses and art fairs.

Theft victims pay to list their items with the Register, which also charges dealers, collectors and insurers fees to search the database to see whether a work is clean.

To law enforcement, the Register’s resources are clearly helpful. Police search the database free, and the company has helped train the F.B.I.’s Art Crime Team.

As a result, some police agencies develop close relationships with it, even recommending that victims register stolen works there.

“If I went to the A.L.R. and said, ‘Did you have any information about this painting?,’ they would give me 30 documents,” said James McAndrew, a former federal agent who tracked stolen art. “They’d have all that, where the cop on the beat would not even know to ask.”

Private Eyes, and Fees

For a man who one day would become an essential figure in the art market, Mr. Radcliffe had little exposure to art growing up, beyond some family portraits that were handed down through the generations.

In the early 1970s, he worked in London as an insurance broker specializing in political risk and later helped to found a company, in which he still has a minority stake, that, among other things, provides advice about security in dangerous countries.

He became involved with art sleuthing in 1991, a few years after a director at Sotheby’s mentioned that auction houses, whose businesses are built on consumer trust, could use a list of stolen artworks to ensure that they were not selling purloined items. It turned out that such a database already existed, managed by a tiny nonprofit organization in New York called the International Foundation for Art Research. Mr. Radcliffe persuaded the foundation to form a partnership with him, though they later split after disagreements over strategy and issues of control. (The foundation still licenses its database to the Register.)

Mr. Radcliffe now owns 68 percent of the Register; Christie’s, Sotheby’s and Bonhams are among the other owners. Last year, he said, it took in $1.25 million, mostly in fees for database searches, and much of the rest in recovery fees from theft victims and insurers that had already paid off claims. But lucrative recoveries are rare, he said, with the median value about $20,000.

Mr. Wittman, the former F.B.I. investigator, said that the appeal of the business goes beyond revenue for Mr. Radcliffe, who enjoys his access to law enforcement and his image as an art world James Bond.

“He wants to be the supersleuth,” he said.

A tall, pale, wraithlike figure with a beak nose and a poker face, Mr. Radcliffe, 65, has a taste for cloak-and-dagger theatricality. Pressed last year, for example, to divulge more about a case in the Balkans, he said: “Maybe the answer is to take you out there one day and introduce you to some of the people concerned and see what happens.”

Then he laughed sardonically.

Certainly, his efforts and others have led to a good number of successful recoveries by the Register, including the return of a valuable Cézanne, one of seven works stolen from a home in Stockbridge, Mass., in 1978.

It was found more than 20 years later after Lloyd’s of London contacted the Register with a query: A Panamanian company was trying to insure a Cézanne painting for transport. Was it stolen?

The database reflected that it was, so Mr. Radcliffe approached its owner, Michael Bakwin. His art had been located. Was he willing to pay a recovery fee?

Mr. Bakwin agreed, and Mr. Radcliffe negotiated a settlement with the Panamanian company. Mr. Bakwin got his Cézanne back in 1999. He sold the work, “Pitcher and Fruits,” a few months later at Sotheby’s for $29.3 million. The Register pocketed a $1.6 million fee.

Years later, when some of the other works appeared on the market, the seller was unmasked as Robert M. Mardirosian, a retired lawyer from Massachusetts who had once represented the thief and came into possession of the paintings when the thief was killed in 1979. He then created the Panamanian shell corporation to hide behind, according to court records.

In 2008, Mr. Mardirosian was convicted of possessing stolen property and forced to return the paintings.

Mr. Radcliffe acknowledges that to pull off this coup, he resorted to some sleight of hand. When the additional paintings surfaced, and Sotheby’s asked him whether they were stolen, he lied, saying they were not. This allowed them to be shipped to the Sotheby’s in London, where they were seized.

Mr. Radcliffe said he has only lied twice about whether paintings were stolen, and is not apologetic, likening the tactic to the police’s misleading a suspect during an investigation.

“When you’re doing a sting operation, for example,” he said, “you don’t say, ‘By the way, I’m lying to you.’ ”

Questionable Tactics

Of course, the Register is not the police, a fact that its critics suggest it too often forgets.

Judy Goffman Cutler, an art dealer who became entangled in a Register hunt for a Norman Rockwell painting, has sued the company twice, contending that it harassed her for years in its zeal to collect a fee for recovering the work.

Mrs. Cutler had clear title to the painting in 1989, when she sold it to the director Steven Spielberg. Later it was mistakenly listed as stolen by the F.B.I. and, consequently, the Register, which tried for years to recover it.

Mrs. Cutler said that the Register pursued her even after company officials had reason to know she had done nothing wrong. Neither of her suits against the company succeeded, and she is still angry.

“They knew better but chose to follow the greedy path,” she said.

The Register has characterized its dispute with Mrs. Cutler as a misunderstanding based on faulty information it received from the F.B.I. and others that suggested that the painting was stolen.

In another case, a woman named Gisela Fischer, whose family’s Pissarro was looted from their Vienna home by the Gestapo in 1938, accuses the Register of a bait-and-switch. It first offered, she said, to find the painting at no cost, citing a longstanding policy to work pro bono to recover art stolen by the Nazis. Years later, though, when the Register developed a lead on the painting, it demanded she sign a new contract, agreeing to its fee. She refused.

“I felt I was being put in the position of a victim,” she said.

Mr. Radcliffe said that the Register must charge fees to underwrite its efforts and that its conduct is no different from that of lawyers who charge to bring restitution cases. But critics said zealousness has marred other efforts by the company.

In 2004, for example, it drew criticism over efforts to recover a 15th-century painting by an Italian artist, Giovanni da Modena, that had been stolen from a Paris gallery.

Mr. Radcliffe approached the gallery with a simple message, according to people involved in the case: He knew where the painting was and could get it back for a fee. The gallery agreed, and the painting was returned.

But the Paris police were livid when they found out that Mr. Radcliffe had used the information to extract a fee, instead of turning it over to investigators tracking the theft.

Mr. Radcliffe said he had provided details of the case to the police — but it was the Italian police, because the case was connected to a string of other robberies they were investigating. He assumed, he said, that the Italians would pass on the information to their French counterparts and could not recall the names of the officers to whom he had spoken. In any event, he said, his police supporters outweigh his detractors.

“On balance, we’re pretty helpful to them,” he said. “You know, they may not like what we do on Case A, but on Case B and C. I mean, we’ve done some very good work for the French police.”

However testy the Register’s relationship with law enforcement, people continue to use the company for one powerful reason: a lack of alternatives. Mr. Marinello, who is leaving at the end of the month to pursue his own art recovery business, said he may try to create a competing database of stolen art. For now, the Register’s place in the market is unique — and many say crucial.

“There have been questions over the years about its financial structure and the potential conflicts of interest there, but if it was to be said that it couldn’t be run because of that, what are we left with?” said Ivan Macquisten, the editor of the British publication Antiques Trade Gazette. “I can’t see that anyone in the last decade has come up with a better idea.”

Art Hostage Comments:
It has to be said that every one of the unlawful, unethical and immoral actions taken by the Art Loss Register was before Christopher Marinello joined the ALR in 2006 and since then Christopher Marinello has tried, sadly in vain, to clean up the operations of The Art Loss Register.
Opposed to the bad faith of Julian Radcliffe, Christopher Marinello embarks on a new venture of trying to establish a lawful way of recovering stolen art.

Stolen Art Watch, The Police Empire Strikes Back, Traveller Museum Raiders, Handlers & Organisers Targeted In Nationwide Swoop

Update:

Cambridgeshire Police say twenty people who were arrested on Tuesday (September 10) as part of a national operation into high-value museum thefts have been released on bail.

Eighteen men and two women were arrested following a series of dawn raids across England and Northern Ireland including four men, aged 24, 41, 44 and 56 who were arrested at the Smithy Fen travellers site in Cottenham in Cambridgeshire.
All 20 have now been bailed until January.
Hundreds of officers from 26 police forces and the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) were involved in national operation.


 

 
Massive raid on Smithy Fen travellers' site in hunt for masterminds behind £15m treasure theft from Cambridge museum

Four men have been arrested in a massive dawn raid today at a travellers’ site near Cambridge as police hunt for £15 million of treasure plundered from the Fitzwilliam Museum.
The News joined detectives at the police invasion of Smithy Fen in Cottenham as part of a nationwide action involving more than 20 police forces.
Four men, aged 24, 41, 44 and 56, were arrested at the site and are among 19 people who have today been arrested across the UK as part of an operation in connection with a series of high-value raids on museum and auction houses.
Seventeen men and two women are currently in custody following dawn raids in England and Northern Ireland.
Hundreds of officers from 26 police forces and the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) are involved in the operation and searches are ongoing at various locations.
Five men, aged 20, 31, 35, 53 and 54, and two women, aged 28 and 54, were arrested in London.
Four men, aged 24, 41, 44 and 56, were arrested in Cambridgeshire.
Two men, aged 28 and 46, were arrested in Essex.
A 60-year-old man was arrested in Sussex, a 32-year-old man was arrested in the West Midlands and a 67-year-old man was arrested in Nottingham.
Three men have been arrested in Northern Ireland.
All of those arrested are being held on suspicion of conspiracy to burgle apart from the 54-year-old woman who was arrested on suspicion of perverting the course of justice and assisting an offender. They are currently in custody at police stations across England and Northern Ireland.
More than 30 officers, including riot police, took part in the action at Smithy Fen this morning.
The raids are also being linked to an international gang of Irish travellers.
Officers are hoping to arrest the criminal kingpins behind thefts of jade from the museum and a series of raids to steal the precious stones across the UK. It is understood other similar investigations are taking place across Europe.
The raid was part of a series of warrants currently being carried out in England and Northern Ireland in connection with a number of high-value raids on museum and auction houses.
Hundreds of officers from 26 police forces and the Serious Organised Crime Agency are involved in the operation.
Searches were made at addresses in London, Sussex, West Midlands, Cambridgeshire, Essex and Northern Ireland.
Today’s action is in connection with six crimes which took place over a four-month period last year at museums and auction houses across England. Chinese artefacts and rhinoceros horn were stolen in six incidents – three at Durham Museum, one at Gorringes Auction House in East Sussex and one each at Norwich Castle Museum and the Fitzwilliam Museum.
While much of the property was subsequently recovered, several high-value items are still missing.
So far, eight people have been convicted and jailed for a total of more than 40 years for their roles in the break-ins.
ACPO lead for serious organised crime, Chief Constable Mick Creedon said: “Today’s operation follows a long and complex pan-European investigation involving officers from 26 police forces and the Serious Organised Crime Agency.
“The series of burglaries last year had a profound effect on museums and similar institutions and we are committed to bringing all those who were involved in the conspiracy to justice.
“Many of the stolen Chinese artefacts are still outstanding and a substantial reward remains on offer for information which leads to the safe return of those priceless items.”
The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has set up a working group to crack down on the emerging issue of heritage crime. The group brings together police officers, English Heritage and other partners in the arts and museum sector to share intelligence and crime prevention advice.
Officers are hoping to arrest the masterminds who orchestrated international jade raids.
And security measures at the Fitzwilliam Museum are to be beefed up in the wake of the devastating burglary of April last year. Chinese treasures worth £15 million stolen.
It is also understood that today’s raids are linked with the arrests of 30 members of an Irish traveller crime network in January. They were alleged to be involved in drug trafficking and organised robbery worldwide.
Police forces across eight European countries took part in the operation.
At least nine members of the organised crime group, known as the ‘Rathkeale Rovers’, have been served with tax demands worth more than £8 million by authorities – following a complex investigation headed by Europol.
International police forces were so concerned with the criminal activities of the ‘Rathkeale Rovers’, they held a special international meeting at Europol in 2011 to thrash out a clear approach on how to tackle the crime network which is made up of several traveller families.
Police forces in the UK, other western European countries and the US are involved in the ongoing investigations.
Two members of the crime network are believed to have been responsible for an art theft from a museum in Norway earlier this year.
The Museum of Decorative Arts in Bergen on January 5 was burgled and thieves escaped with haul of Chinese artefacts – some of which are 4,000 years old.
Europol has said the crime network recently started to specialise in the theft and illegal trade of rhino horn.
None of the 18 jade artefacts stolen from the Fitzwilliam have been recovered following the break-in which was described by the museum’s then acting director as having tarnished the museum’s reputation as a “guardian of treasures”.
Three men and a 15-year-old boy were able to walk to the back of the museum to a ground floor window to cut a square hole through metal shutters before breaking the window.
Detectives are today hoping to arrest the organised criminals behind the Fitzwilliam gang.
They were caught using CCTV footage of them casing the joint on the previous day, and DNA evidence from a Fanta bottle discarded by the boy, Marvin Simos who got a four-month detection order.
Steven Coughlan and Patrick Kiely, both from London, and Robert Smith, of Kent, were jailed for six years each last September.
Two men were also convicted of the theft of £1.8 million worth of Chinese artefacts from Durham University’s Oriental Museum in April last year.

Nineteen arrested after dawn raids across the country including traveller camp over series of break-ins that targeted Chinese artefacts worth millions

• Four men arrested this morning at Smithy Fen travellers' site in Cottenham, Cambridgeshire
• Total of 17 men and 2 women arrested from across London, Cambridgeshire, Sussex, Essex, West Midlands and Nottingham
  
• Police from 26 forces and Serious Organised Crime Agency execute dawn raids as part of Operation Elven into six museum and auction house break-ins last year
• Robberies at Durham University Oriental Museum, Gorringes Auction House, Norwich Castle Museum and Fitzwilliam Museum over four months in 2012
• Thefts and attempted thefts targeted items belonging to Admiral Lord Nelson, rhino horn and Chinese jade

Hundreds of police launched a series of dawn raids yesterday in the hunt for crooks who looted treasures worth millions from British museums and auction houses.
Nineteen suspects were arrested in the blitz which involved officers from 26 forces and the Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca), and included a swoop on the Cambridgeshire travellers' site of Smithy Fen.
An address in Fifth Avenue, Low Hill, Wolverhampton was also raided as part of Operation Elven, a nationwide action following the spate of thefts of artefacts during a four-month period last year.

Raid: A Cottenham travellers' site was targeted in connection with thefts on museums and auction houses

Dawn: The Smithy Fen site was targeted with connections to the Fitzwilliam Museum robbery

Nationwide: 19 people in total have been arrested - 17 men and two women - including three men from Northern Ireland

Addresses in London, Sussex, West Midlands, Essex and Northern Ireland were also hit at 6am in connection with the six museum and auction house break-ins.
Eighteen jade figurines worth £15m were taken from from the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge and £1.8m of Chinese artefacts were snatched from Durham University.
Police believe the same network commissioned raids on Gorringes auction house in East Sussex and ordered Rhino horns to be stolen from Norwich Castle Museum.
Two men were also convicted of the theft of Chinese artefacts from Durham University's Oriental Museum in April last year.
West Midlands Police were the first out of the 26 forces involved to confirm the arrest of a 32-year-old man in Walsall today after officers raided addresses in Bentley, Walsall and Low Hill, Wolverhampton, which had been identified by Soca.

Hunt: Rewards have been issued for the £15million worth of treasure plundered from the Fitzwilliam Museum

Organised: Soca and officers from 26 police forces are involved in the nationwide operation

Questions: Investigations are still going on across the country in relation to the spate of robberies across four months in early 2012

Crackdown: The men arrested at the Cambridgeshire traveller site were aged 24, 41, 44 and 56

Police have since confirmed seven arrests in London - five men, aged 20, 31, 35, 53 and 54, and two women aged 28 and 54.
Four men, aged 24, 41, 44 and 56, were arrested in Cambridgeshire and two men, aged 28 and 46, were arrested in Essex.
In Sussex, a 60-year-old man was arrested, and a 67-year-old man in Nottingham.
Three men have been arrested in Northern Ireland.

Cambridgeshire Police, which is leading the operation, said all of those arrested were being held on suspicion of conspiracy to burgle except the 54-year-old woman, who was arrested on suspicion of perverting the course of justice and assisting an offender.

Convictions have already been secured against some thieves who carried out contracts to steal the collectors items.

Eight people have already been convicted and jailed for a total of more than 40 years for their roles in the raids.
Three men were imprisoned for 18 years for the theft of artefacts from the Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge.
Steven Coughlan, 26, and Patrick Kiely, 30, both from London, and Robert Smith, 25, of Kent, were all given prison sentences after being found guilty after a trial last September.

'Pan-European': Further arrests in Wolverhampton were part of the operation that police say is working with forces abroad

Major: Operation Elven has been launched to recover items stolen from museums and involves raids like these in Wolverhampton

Marvin Simos, 15, was also handed a four-month detection order for his involvement in the gang.
So far, eight people have been convicted and jailed for their roles in the break-ins that happened between February and May 2012.
On February 25, objects belonging to Admiral Lord Nelson worth £36,800 were taken from Norwich Castle Museum, including medals marking the naval hero's death at the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805, a saucer from a tea set he was said to have used, and a gold mourning ring worn by his family and valued at £25,000.
Days earlier, four men had attempted to steal a Rhino's head from the museum, but were tackled by museum staff.

One month later, staff and customers at Gorringes Auction House foiled robbers who leapt over a ceramics counter to steal a rhino horn - although the thieves managed to make off with a cloisonne bird and a bamboo libation cup.

Thorough: A 32-year-old man was arrested in the West Midlands as part of the raids

Investigation: Police raided properties and garages early this morning

In April 2012, five men were arrested after a gang of thieves chiselled through the wall of the Oriental Museum in Durham and stole Chinese artefacts worth £2million.
The thieves spent 40 minutes making a 2ft-by-3ft hole in the wall before taking a porcelain figure and an 18th-century jade bowl - both of the Chinese Qing dynasty of 1644-1912 - from the ground floor of the museum.
And in the same fortnight, 18 items - said by some experts to be worth £18million in total - were ransacked from the Chinese galleries of Cambridge's Fitzwilliam Museum, including an 18th-century carved jade buffalo, a carved horse from the 17th century and a green and brown jade elephant.
Arrests were made at some of the incidents and much of the stolen property has since been recovered but several valuable items are still missing.

Target: Durham University's Oriental Museum was one of the institutions affected in last year's spate of robberies

Raid: Thieves chiselled a 2ft-by-3ft hold in the wall of the Oriental Museum of Durham University in April 2012

Ransacked: After working at the wall for 40 minutes, it took the robbers just a minute to take Chinese artefacts from the museum

Jade: A 'recumbant buffalo' and an 'imaginary beast', two statuettes stolen from Cambridge's Fitzwilliam Museum in April 2012

Reward: Police are still searching for many of the artefacts that were stolen

Antique: The Chinese artefacts date back to the Qing dynasty

Chief Constable Mick Creedon, the Association of Chief Police Officers’ (Acpo) lead for serious organised crime, said the operation was part of 'a long and complex pan-European investigation'.

'The series of burglaries last year had a profound effect on museums and similar institutions and we are committed to bringing all those who were involved in the conspiracy to justice,' he said.
'Many of the stolen Chinese artefacts are still outstanding and a substantial reward remains on offer for information which leads to the safe return of those priceless items.'
Acpo has set up a working group to crack down on the emerging issue of heritage crime, which brings together police, English Heritage and other partners in the arts and museum sector to share intelligence and crime prevention advice.

Dishonour: A mourning ring worn by Admiral Lord Nelson's family after his death at the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805 and thought to be worth £25,000 was one of the items stolen from Norwich Castle Museum

Break-in: Thieves stole 18 items of Chinese art from the Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge in April 2012

Speaking after a 15-year-old old boy and three men were convicted of conspiracy to burgle following the raid on the University of Cambridge’s Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridgeshire police acknowledged they were unlikely to have caught everybody involved.

The defence counsel told the court 'others higher up the chain', who had not been identified, recruited the men to target the jade exhibits.
Cambridge Crown Court heard it was unlikely the men knew the true value of the items which it is thought were sold to rich Chinese collectors.
Rhino horn has a particularly high value on the black market due to beliefs that they contain medicinal powers and their use in some cultures in ceremonial daggers.
Horns can fetch around £50,000 per kilogram, making them more valuable than cocaine or gold.

CAB and ERU raid homes as part of probe into €40m crime gang-

-

-

Criminal Assets Bureau (CAB) and members of the Emergency Response Unit have raided a number of properties in connection to a Europol investigation into the activities of an international crime gang

10 September 2013

DOZENS of homes have been raided in an international police investigation into the theft of valuable rhino horns.

An organised crime gang, linked by European security chiefs to a large traveller family originally from the west of Ireland, is believed to have netted goods and artefacts worth €40 million in a string of robberies.
Armed gardai and officers from the Criminal Asset Bureau (Cab) raided homes in the Rathkeale and Raheen areas of Limerick and in Newmarket in Cork.
One of the gangs suspected of involvement in the thefts has been nicknamed the Rathkeale Rovers.
A large amount of documentation, a small amount of cash, some artefacts and paintings were recovered and confiscated during the operation.
No arrests were made.
The Garda press office said that the raids were targeted on the three towns as part of the ongoing investigation into the assets and financial affairs of a gang suspected of extensive criminality.
They are involved in labour exploitation, counterfeiting, tarmac scams, tobacco smuggling and the theft of rhino horns and rare Chinese cultural artefacts, Europol have said.
Over the last three years, there have been more than 60 recorded thefts of rhino horns and Asian art from museums and private collections across Europe.
For the last two years, Europol has been tracking a suspected Irish organised crime gang which it warned was one of the most significant players in the illegal global trade in rhino horns.
They are wanted over robberies in Italy, Germany and the UK. They are believed to have links to North and South America, China and Australia and use "intimidation and violence" in their activities.
Cab officers in Ireland have been involved in the Europol initiative to target the international crime gang.
Agencies in the UK, including the Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca) and local police forces, have carried out more than 30 searches, including some in Northern Ireland, as part of the investigation.
Police in Britain, Italy, Belgium, Germany, Sweden, Portugal and France have all linked the theft of rhino horns to Ireland.
The Garda press office said the raids in Rathkeale, Raheen and Newmarket were carried out to gather evidence.

The latest rhino horn theft hit museum bosses in Ireland in April this year, despite them being put into storage for safekeeping.

Three masked men broke into the National Museum of Ireland's Collections Resource Centre (CRC) in a warehouse in north Dublin and tied up a security man before leaving an hour later with four rhino heads holding eight horns.

Due to the level of the robberies, some European museums have replaced the real rhino horns with copies and some of these were stolen, one in Germany.

Rhino horn, which consists only of keratin, is sold in Chinese traditional medicine and claimed to be anything from an aphrodisiac to a cure for a hangover or cancer or even just a decoration.

Conservationists warn those using the illegal product that they would be better off biting their nails.

Stolen Art Watch, Pink Panthers Targeted, Art Crime Round Up

Swiss Pink Panther jewel thief back in prison

A combination of two undated pictures released by the Swiss police on July 26, 2013 shows (at L) a member of the Pink Panther gang Bosnian Milan Poparic and (at R) Switzerland's Adrian Albrecht. Picture: AFP

Related Stories

• Inspector Clouseau required after French Riviera heists

BASEL - A member of the Pink Panthers jewel thief gang was detained in Switzerland, one month after he staged an elaborate escape from a Swiss prison, police said Friday.
Fifty police officers were involved in the capture in a house in Chatel-St-Denis, in western Switzerland, on Thursday.
The 34-year old Bosnian had escaped a Swiss prison in Orbe in late July with the help of accomplices who drove through fences and held prison guards in check by firing automatic weapons.
Last week, French police caught a Macedonian-French Pink Panthers member who had escaped from another Swiss prison near Lausanne in May after accomplices had thrown cutting tools and a fake pistol into a prison courtyard.
The Pink Panthers are a network of hundreds of criminals from the former Yugoslavia. They have stolen jewellery worth more than 300 million euros (389 million dollars) since 1999 around the world, according to Interpol.

France refuses to extradite 'Pink Panther' suspect

NIMES, France / Gard (AFP) - France on Wednesday rejected a Swiss extradition request for a suspected member of the infamous Pink Panther gang of international jewel thieves who was arrested earlier this month.
Zoran Tomovic, born in Montenegro but with French and Macedonian citizenships, had been on the run since escaping from a Swiss prison in May, where he was serving time for armed robbery.
The 47-year-old, a former member of the French Foreign Legion elite force, was detained on August 19 at his home in the southern town of Bedarrides.
A court in Nimes, not far from the town, on Wednesday ruled against sending him to Switzerland as France does not extradite its own citizens.
Tomovic is suspected of having stolen jewels in Switzerland and other countries including Germany, Austria, Monaco, Britain, Japan, France and Dubai.
The court will examine on September 25 another extradition demand by Macedonia, where he was tried and convicted in absentia in 1998 for murder, as well as his request to be released.
The Pink Panthers emerged from the conflict in the former Yugoslavia to become the most successful jewel thieves in the world.
According to Interpol, they have since 1999 snatched jewels with a value in excess of 330 million euros ($440 million) in heists that are often executed with breathtaking speed and precision.
They gained their nickname with a raid on a London branch of Graff Diamonds in 2003, in which two of them posed as wealthy would-be customers, persuading staff to open doors for them before helping themselves to diamonds worth millions.
Although one of the robbers was overpowered at the scene and another later arrested, only a fraction of the diamonds were recovered, one of them hidden in a pot of face cream.
That was reminiscent of a scene from the 1975 film "The Return of the Pink Panther" and resulted in a nickname that the gang members themselves adopted, wearing pink shirts for a subsequent raid in Zurich. 

Church art thieves 'waiting to sell' – gardai

AN appeal for information on the theft of valuable Catholic church paintings has not led to a single call.

Despite offering a substantial reward for information on the theft of the six 'Stations of the Cross' paintings from St Peter and Paul's Church, near Athenry, Co Galway, two months ago, not one call was received.
Detectives now believe the gang behind the thefts may be biding their time before attempting to sell them off and could wait for up to a year before making any move.
Local parish priest Fr Michael McNamara said he and the local parish were slowly having to accept that the paintings may never be returned.
"There was not one call after we offered the reward," he said.
The church is now making final inquiries on having replicas of the missing six paintings made.
"We were hoping all the time they would be returned to us, but at this stage we have to accept we may never get them back. If we hear nothing in the next few weeks we will go ahead with the replicas and hope to have them ready for Christmas.
"Detectives believe they are still in the country and the thieves are waiting for an opportunity to sell them on, but it could take a year before anything is done."
The church is also erecting CCTV cameras next week in a bid to avoid any further thefts.
"I hate having to put CCTV in the church but people say we'll have to lock the church during the day if we don't," he added.
The six 'Stations of the Cross', painted by Irish artist Evie Hone, were stolen on June 22.
Gardai believe the theft was carried out by a professional gang after no trace or fingerprint was discovered following the robbery.
The keys to the back door of the church had been stolen one week prior to the incident. The pieces had not been secured to the wall and no damage was done to the church during the robbery. Gardai have alerted auction houses in Ireland to be on the lookout. Interpol is also assisting in the investigation.
The six oil paintings stolen depict the scenes from the third, fourth, fifth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth Stations of the Cross.

Despite Pledge, France Lags in Hunt for Looted Art

PARIS — When France’s culture minister, Aurélie Filippetti, handed over six looted 18th-century paintings to a Boston man in March, she declared a new “proactive approach” to tracking the original owners of recovered artworks that were stolen by the Nazis.

The announcement was welcomed here and abroad as an overdue step after decades of bureaucratic resistance to returning the art in a nation scarred by the most systematic plunder of any country during World War II.

But since that pledge nearly six months ago, there has been scant evidence of change. Ms. Filippetti created two groups to study the subject and submit progress reports to her, one due at the end of the year to describe objects that can be tracked and a second due next summer. No additional funds have been earmarked for research, and no additional staff members have been hired or dedicated to this project, Thierry Bajou, the ministry official in charge of the recovery effort, acknowledged.

There is one employee assigned to research unclaimed art in French museums — a laborious process. At the Foundation for the Memory of the Shoah, there is a specialist in the World War II art market who advises the ministry project but also juggles part-time work maintaining cultural archives.

During the German occupation, about 100,000 art objects were confiscated from Jews in France and sent to Germany by train. Although more than 61,000 were recovered and more than 45,000 returned by 1949, thousands have not yet been reunited with their owners. More than 2,000 of the works that were considered orphaned were distributed among 57 French museums. Since 1951, barely more than 100 of these have been returned.

In a recent response to questions by e-mail, Ms. Filippetti, who declined to be interviewed in person, counseled patience. It is more difficult to identify looted art today because of “the deaths of the victims and their direct descendants,” she said, “and not because of a lack of will on the part of museums.” She said she expects three or four works to be returned over the next two years. “Until now, we have waited for inheritors or relatives to trigger research procedures,” Ms. Filippetti said in March. “I want to introduce a more proactive approach under which France will seek the owners whether or not a formal request has been made.”

The culture minister’s declaration came on the heels of pressure from Corinne Bouchoux, a French senator in the Green Party, who had issued a legislative report on the recovery efforts. Her report — a strategy to develop “clean museums” — was particularly critical of the lack of public access to French archives that prevents descendants from gathering vital evidence to press claims dating back to the chaotic days of the war. Some records, including those of the Louvre, are closed to the public, and there is limited access or none at all to many of the other archives, which are held by museums and government or military agencies. Ms. Bouchoux said that, in addition to the 2,000 works known to have been turned over to museums, there may be another 4,000 with murky origins that were purchased during the war and later donated to museums. Their contributors were often listed as anonymous in order to give the works legitimacy.

No effort has been made to conduct a comprehensive audit or track down the owners or their families for any of these works, she said in an interview. “Everyone believed that this problem was settled but it was a delusion,” Ms. Bouchoux said. “It was a collective forgetting.”

She plans to introduce legislation to force museums to accelerate the process if the culture ministry does not follow up on its pledge.

In other countries, some museums have taken a more aggressive approach. In 2006, the Dutch government returned 202 paintings from its national collection to the heir of a Jewish art dealer whose Amsterdam gallery had been looted by Hermann Goering. Vienna has handed over almost 6,000 looted objects since it started an audit 14 years ago of more than 70,000 items in museums and libraries. Some art historians have taken extraordinary measures to work around the French system, where descendants complain that they remain at the mercy of bureaucrats who can unilaterally decide whether to allow access or not.

Elizabeth Royer, a Paris gallery owner and art historian who specializes in the provenance of works, decided the only way to circumvent the system was to create her own archives. Four years ago, she and her assistants started systematically photographing records held by the French Foreign Ministry. The results now fill the basement of her building. She opens her archives to other researchers and officials from foreign museums who say they find access through the gallery owner easier than through the French authorities. Ms. Royer, who has helped descendants recover a dozen looted paintings, said she remains pessimistic about any change in policy in France, where the topic has long been a source of shame, indifference and resistance.

“There are a lot of people who say time has passed, and this is enough,” she said. “I would agree if the archives are open, but so many things are hidden and closed.”

That is the primary complaint of descendants who have struggled to navigate the bureaucracy. Alexandre Bronstein, a great-great-nephew of the art collector Julie Reinach, has spent years searching for works plundered in 1941 by Nazis who burned the family home in St.-Germain-en-Laye.

“The basic view of museum curators is that this is ours,” said Mr. Bronstein, who said he has encountered resistance at institutions when he has sought to look at the backs of paintings for telltale marks of his family member.

Alain Monteagle, 65, a retired history teacher, is hunting among museum holdings for parts of an art collection taken from an aunt, Anna Jaffe. Ms. Royer’s documents show that in 1943 in Nice, Ms. Jaffe’s possessions were auctioned off in a fire sale of trinkets, bronzes, and “important paintings, ancient and modern,” which included landscapes by John Constable.

Unlike many descendants, Mr. Monteagle and his relatives have managed to obtain the return of eight artworks from the Louvre and the Kimbell Art Museum in Fort Worth. He has volunteered to help the research groups. His view is that, despite the culture minister’s pronouncements, there has been no change in museum behavior. “But then,” he noted, “a few months is not long for the French state.”

Some experts say increased availability to information through social networking tools and other Internet resources could make the search easier.

The Centre Pompidou cultural complex, which holds 44 paintings looted during the war, insists it is trying to reflect a proactive spirit. After Ms. Bouchoux, the French senator, issued her critique and recommendations, it posted a list of the works and a new subject on its online database: “Works recovered in Germany after the fall of the Third Reich.”

The information is not easy to find, but the museum plans to lend three orphan paintings by Fedor Löwenstein for an exhibition in Bordeaux that could help publicize the unclaimed art. All were donated as a mysterious gift to the museum in 1973. In 2011, they were reclassified as stolen works.

How Posters Stolen By The Nazis Resurfaced At A Jewish Museum In South Florida

Hans Sachs left this earth without knowing what happened to his beloved poster collection.
In 1898, when Sachs was a teenager, he began collecting posters in Berlin of advertisements, political propaganda and rare pieces by famed artists such as Cheret, Kandinsky and Lucian Bernhard.
His passion for graphic art was so serious he amassed 12,500 posters and a separate collection of 18,000 tins, postcards and theater programs reflective of this art form.
He kept them stored and on display in a specially built room in his home. But one fateful day in 1938, Nazis swooped in and forced Sachs to pack up and load his entire collection in trucks waiting outside. His collection was swept away.
When Sachs was later thrown into Sachsenhausen Concentration Camp, his wife Felicia made a convincing plea to have him released. Shortly after, he, his wife and their one-year-old son Peter fled Germany to live in the United States.
In 1966, Hans Sachs learned that some of his collection had emerged in East Berlin, but he failed to reclaim it. A Harvard-educated dentist and world leading poster collector, he died in 1974.



“My father never discussed what happened to his posters, but he always expressed his love for the art form,” wrote Peter Sachs from Las Vegas, and until recently, was a longtime Sarasota resident.
In 2005,  Peter Sachs unlocked the mystery of the whereabouts of his father’s posters. He did what many do online when a question arises. He Googled it, resulting in the discovery that the German Historical Museum in Berlin had archived and displayed a portion of his father’s collection since the fall of the Berlin Wall.
He sought legal counsel, hired a law firm then launched a painstaking seven-year battle to reclaim his father’s posters from the German museum. The case went all the way to Germany’s high court, and in October 2012, Sachs was finally awarded 4,344 posters, nearly 74 years after they were confiscated.
“It was a bittersweet victory. I felt vindicated by the German High Court ruling, but my father didn’t live to see his beloved posters returned to him. I also thought the German government behaved disgracefully during the whole process,” he wrote.



Now with the posters intact, Sachs has graciously allowed the Jewish Museum of Florida-FIU to showcase 21 of them as part of an exhibition running through December 2013.
“This is the first time a museum in the United States has displayed any of the posters. There is currently an exhibition of some of the posters in Affiche Museum, which is the Dutch Poster Museum in Hoorn, The Netherlands,” Sachs wrote. “ A few years ago, the Jewish Museum [of Florida-FIU] had an exhibition on Nazi looted art. They included information about my father’s collection and my battle to get it back in the exhibition. I felt a special connection to the museum at FIU and always hoped that if I won the court battle, some of the posters would be displayed there.”
And so they are in all their glory with rich, vivid colors still intact.
Visit www.jewishmuseum.com for more information.

What if You Found a Diamond? The Mitzvah of Returning Lost Objects

Posted by Rabbi Dr. Shmuly Yanklowitz

Leaving aside religious conviction, local laws, and even secular morality for a moment, consider this question: What would you do if you were homeless and stumbled across a very valuable object that could help you eat and get back on your feet?

A diamond engagement ring was accidently thrown into homeless Billy Ray Harris’ cup but when he saw Sarah Darling again, he made sure to get the ring back to her. Once this good deed hit the headlines, over 7,000 donors have pledged over $150,000 to support Harris. Harris’ response is most telling: “I like it, but I don’t think I deserve it… What has the world come to when a person returns something that doesn’t belong to him, and all this happens?” What Harris considered the obvious right thing to do, and his motivation to carry that out in the face of a lucrative (and probably much-needed) payoff, may not be everyone’s inclination, but it should be.

Jewish law is unequivocal about the obligation to return lost items (Deuteronomy 22). The Torah prohibits ignoring property that clearly was lost and keeping a lost object, and  commands returning such an item. Halakhah says that these laws only apply to objects that have a siman (a distinguishing feature that only an owner would be able to identify). A typical $1 bill on a sidewalk, for example, has no distinguishing feature indicating that it has a particular owner. This limitation only applies, of course, if there is no other way to identify who the owner is. The rabbis teach that it is midat hasidut (pious and good) to work to return a lost object even when it has no clear unique feature to it.  How does our modern society fare on this subject?

Some data on lost items is encouraging. Worldwide, in 2009 airlines lost 300,000 bags of luggage, more than half during flight transfers. About 97 percent of these bags were eventually returned to their owners, but about 80,000 bags were eventually given away, offered for sale, or destroyed. In another largely encouraging example, in 2012, the ASPCA published the results of a poll of cat and dog owners. Of those reported as lost, 93 percent of dogs and 75 percent of cats were returned to their owners. Of dogs found, only 15 percent were identified by microchip or identification tags and 6 percent were found in shelters, so most were returned by the good will of strangers.

Sadly, there are also many examples of people who were tempted to take what did not belong to them or to hide items that came to them through unethical means. For example, as of October 2012, about 400 TSA employees have been fired for stealing items from airline passenger luggage.

The art world, even in the best of times, is filled with fraud, as many art works have "disappeared" from museums and never reappeared, most likely because an unscrupulous art collector has hidden it away in their private quarters. One of the most notorious examples of modern art theft occurred during the Nazi era, when thousands of art objects were stolen from Jewish citizens and museums throughout Europe. In the succeeding decades, many of these objects were returned to the original owners or their descendants, but progress has been slow. In 1998, the United States joined more than 40 other nations in signing the Washington Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, which was supposed to set up principles that would help descendants of former owners recover art objects stolen by the Nazis. However, the Holocaust Art Restitution Project and other organizations have accused many American museums of deliberately being uncooperative or delaying the transfer of these art objects to their rightful owners. If the accusations are true, the museums would be violating the Jewish commandment not to keep a stolen object and not to hide the stolen object in order to retain possession.

While much of the documentation on many objects stolen during Nazi rule is murky, there is no contesting the facts of the most famous case of stolen art. The "Elgin Marbles," statues taken from the Parthenon in Athens by the British ambassador in the early 19th century and still on display at the British Museum in London, have drawn controversy for some time. The Greek government has requested their return for about 30 years, but the British are adamant that the Parthenon statues belong to the world and that they have the best ability to display them, an argument that betrays a continuing colonial attitude. The UNESCO convention in 1970 established rules (mostly voluntary) restricting the ability of one nation to expropriate property from another country without legal authority, but these rules only cover transactions after 1970.

These types of rules, and people regularly and without fanfare carrying them out, are both a mitzvah in the Jewish sense and a norm that builds trust within and across societies. When one has lost something, it can be very disorienting. If a lost item is returned, it rebuilds ones sense of trust in one’s fellow person. Daily, we see inspiring examples of those who go out of their way to return valuables, while we also see depressing examples of people who claim to be refined, yet behave in a deceitful manner to prevent people from recovering lost goods. Jewish law can teach us much in promoting and achieving a just society, and universal morality and shifting social norms will create needed change. Whatever the source, looking out for our fellows and the worldly possessions that contribute to who we are, the integrity that comes with acquiring something honestly, will ensure deeper societal trust making the world a better place to live.

Rabbi Dr. Shmuly Yanklowitz is the Executive Director of the Valley Beit Midrash, the Founder & President of Uri L’Tzedek, the Founder and CEO of The Shamayim V’Aretz Institute and the author of “Jewish Ethics & Social Justice: A Guide for the 21st Century.” Newsweek named Rav Shmuly one of the top 50 rabbis in America.”

Isle of Man police probe 'heirloom' coin theft

Police have launched an investigation after about 60 ancient coins were stolen from a house in the Isle of Man.

A spokesman said the antiques, which include several 19th Century gold sovereigns, were taken from a house in Ballasalla between May and July.
The coins, thought to be worth several thousand pounds, also include a silver US dollar which was minted in 1921.
PC Adrian Brooks said the theft of the family "heirlooms" had caused "financial loss and distress."
He added: "Due to the large amount of coins and their unusual nature, I am hopeful that if someone has seen the coins or perhaps been offered them to buy that they will remember them."
Anyone with information is asked to contact Port Erin Police Station.

$39K in paintings stolen from shed

The Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office is investigating the theft of $39,400 worth of paintings from a storage shed.
The owner, an art dealer, told deputies that someone cut a padlock on his unit at Butterfly Springs Storage in Pojoaque sometime between Sunday and Monday. Once inside, the burglar took a speaker and five framed paintings. These paintings are described in an incident report as a “Machrado” painting, a hide painting, a cathedral painting, a diptych painting and a painting of a flute player.
Deputies are awaiting a surveillance video of the storage unit. They also found a wine glass inside that had several fingerprints on it. The glass will be analyzed by the state crime lab. 

Antique thieves target delivery van

THOUSANDS of euro worth of antiques were taken by opportunist thieves last week after a van containing the antiques was stolen in Limerick city over the weekend.
And the owner of the van and the associated antique store believes that he was followed prior to the theft and his movements were observed and noted before the thieves struck.
The van, a dark blue Fiat Ducato, was taken from outside St John’s Cathedral on Friday between 4pm and 5pm.
Gardai said that the van was recovered but the items contained inside were stolen.
Both the owner and gardai are appealing for witnesses to the incident to come forward and assist with the investiogation.
Patrick, who is in the antiques business took to local radio to explain his plight and believes that the thieves were targeting the van specifically for its contents.
“We would have been spotted driving the van around town and maybe the doors were open and closed a few times and I think we were followed so guys would have been waiting for the opportunity.”
Describing the 2007 Cork registered van, Patrick told Limerick’s Live 95FM that the registration of the van is 07C6544 and he is hoping that members of the public in the area noticed the movements of the unscrupulous thieves involved.

Sacred art stolen from Andean churches

The thieves tunneled under the thick walls of the colonial-era Roman Catholic church in the tiny southern Bolivian town of San Miguel de Tomave, emerged through the floor and made off with five 18th-century oil paintings of inestimable value.

'Jesus con la Cruz a Cuesta' was stolen from the San Pedro de la Paz church in 2003 and recovered in Lima in 2005 Photo: AP

It was the third time the highlands church had been plundered of sacred art since 2007. Most of the finely-etched silver that once graced its altar was already gone.

"Who would have thought they would take the canvases, too?" the Rev. Francisco Dubert, the parish priest, asked of the oil paintings depicting the Virgin Mary.

Increasingly bold thefts plague colonial churches in remote Andean towns in Bolivia and Peru, where authorities say cultural treasures are disappearing at an alarming rate. At least 10 churches have been hit so far this year in the two culturally rich but economically poor countries.

"We think the thefts are being done on behalf of collectors," said the Rev. Salvador Piniero, archbishop of Peru's highlands Ayacucho province. Religious and cultural authorities say criminal bands are stealing "to order" for foreigners.

Bolivian churches have been robbed 38 times of 447 objects since 2009 - of highly stylized decorative silverwork, canvases, polished gold and silver altar pieces and gem-encrusted jewelry, said the country's cultural patrimony chief, Lupe Meneses.
In Peru, at least 30 thefts from churches and chapels have been reported since January 2012, including two this month: Churches in Ayacucho and Puno provinces were robbed of ornamental silver laminate, or gold and silver crowns, earrings and necklaces.

In Tomave, other canvases were left behind, Mr Dubert said, indicating the thieves knew exactly what they wanted. "These churches are being robbed because terrible people want to own beautiful things." Donna Yates, a University of Glasgow archaeologist blogged afterward.
Dr Yates, who is studying the Andes thefts for a global, European Union-funded project, said the hemorrhaging of priceless ecclesiastical art in the region has continued at a steady pace "but it's getting more brazen."
"Who is behind it? I can't say," she said. "The market for these goods is in Europe and the United States," she says, with Santa Fe, New Mexico, one destination as a magnet for collectors of Latin American art.
Cultural officials in the Andes have long struggled to protect Incan and pre-Columbian cultural treasures. Now, colonial sacred art has become a similar worry. By law, it is all national patrimony, its export illegal.
Where possible, churches are being fortified. Video cameras were installed and nighttime guards posted last year at Ayacucho's main cathedral in Huamanga, host to Peru's biggest annual religious pilgrimage.
But poor, rural parishes are on their own, particularly along the highlands plateau where Spanish colonial missionaries built isolated settlements.
In January, church thieves stole 12 gold crowns and a pair of silver shoes of a baby Jesus statue in the isolated Ayacucho town of Santo Domingo de Chungui, said regional culture director Mario Cueto.
He appealed afterward "for greater monitoring on highways and at international airports." But the thefts almost always go unsolved.
In one of the most audacious thefts, national treasures disappeared in April from the Church of the Virgin of Copacabana on Lake Titicaca.
A wooden 16th-century statue of Bolivia's patron saint was stripped of 18 precious jewels worth an estimated $1 million by thieves who poisoned two mastiffs and laced the parish workers' evening meal with tranquilizers. While everyone slept, the thieves broke a window and gained entry with a ladder.
A visiting priest and the female owner of a hostel where he was staying were arrested in the theft. Prosecutors say they are suspected of assisting a criminal gang.
Most targets are more like the Tomave church, unprotected by anything more than a lock and chain on the door when last burgled in December. Most are built above 13,100 feet and at least 60 miles from the nearest police station. As for burglar alarms, electricity is unreliable when it exists at all.
"Security is impossible," said Dr Yates. "You are left with the kind of situation where you could either try to take all the goods out of these rural churches, which is ethnically questionable because you are taking people's heritage away from them."
Even if the art were removed, there is no place to safely store it.
Not even the La Merced church in Bolivia's southern regional capital of Potosi, whose silver mine was once the Spanish empire's economic engine, was immune from one of the year's biggest heists.
Among loot stolen after an alarm was deactivated: An 18th-century scapular shield encrusted with pearls, diamonds, rubies and emeralds worth an estimated $1 million. Also taken: part of a huge silver archway laminate. 

How stolen Dutch art fooled even Sotheby's expert eyes

A cunningly disguised stolen work by Dutch contemporary artist Jan Schoonhoven managed to fool experts at the world's largest art broker Sotheby's, who auctioned it in late June for nearly $300,000.

Now Dutch police are investigating and questions are being asked how the modern art relief, sculpted in 1969 by one of the country's best-known fine artists, managed to slip through the net of a carefully managed system to end up on a London auction block.
Simply named "R69-32" -- referring to the year of creation and an identification number -- the white rectangular work which consists of blocks filled with triangles made of papier-mache, disappeared from the Van Bommel Van Dam Museum in the eastern city of Venlo in March.
It was one of four pieces stolen at the time. How they disappeared and who took them remains a mystery and forms part of the police investigation.
Paul van Rosmalen, a Schoonhoven expert who works for Amsterdam's Borzo Modern and Contemporary Art gallery, was the first to spot the deception.
"The work was simply turned on its side and the series number slightly altered," Van Rosmalen told AFP.
He said the thief changed the series number from "32" to "39" therefore passing it off as a different work.
Schoonhoven, who died in 1994, produced numerous works in series from papier mache which were almost identical in appearance and very hard to tell apart.
It was a simple but devious scheme -- and effective enough to fool even the experts at Sotheby's, Van Rosmalen said.
Immediately after the March 22 break-in, Van Bommel Van Dam museum officials notified the London-based Art Loss Register (ALR), the world's largest database of stolen art, about the theft.
Apart from R69-32, three other works, two by Schoonhoven and one by Czech contemporary artist Tomas Rajlich, also disappeared.
Barely three months later however, the now altered "R69-39" showed up for auction at Sotheby's, which was then alerted by the ALR, saying it might potentially match a stolen art work in their database.
Sotheby's, however, said it "confirmed to the Art Loss Register that the title on the back of our work did not match the title in their records."
"The ALR did not follow up to notify us that they nevertheless believed the work was indeed a stolen work," the auction house said in a statement.
At a resulting auction on June 27, "R69-39" fetched a price of 182,500 pounds (213,000 euros, $285,000) and was combinedly bought by the Borzo in Amsterdam and London's Mayor Gallery.
Borzo's Van Rosmalen became suspicious looking at pictures of the work sent by colleagues in London.
"Looking at the pictures I was sent it is very clear that the title on the "2" on the back had been changed to a "9", therefore R69-32 became R69-39," he said.
Sotheby's confirmed that the sale has now been put on ice.
ALR chairman Julian Radcliffe told AFP it did not go further than the initial alert it gave Sotheby's because "neither we nor Sotheby's knew that the number had been changed."
Nobody in the case doubted Sotheby's good intentions either.
As for the three other stolen artworks, just over a week ago, a man walked into an Amsterdam police station bearing the two other Schoonhoven reliefs and the Rajlich work stolen together with "R69-32".
Identified only as "Ryan L." in the Dutch media, the man was arrested on the spot.
Ryan L. however, said he was simply returning the stolen works which he claimed he had bought for 100 euros, Dutch daily NRC Handelsblad reported.
"All three art works have been authenticated as the ones stolen in March," Dutch police told AFP, confirming an investigation was underway.
In the meantime, Theo Manders, the collector to whom the artworks belonged at the time of the March theft, had been paid out 1.1 million euros in an insurance claim, Van Bommel Van Dam Museum spokesman Paul Hermans told AFP.

Judge dresses down defendant in hunting camp burglary: 'You've got to be kidding'

 

From left to right, Matthew Boykin Walker, Timothy Smith and Kristopher Joseph Ambrose will go to prison after a judge sentenced them on Friday, Aug. 23, 2013, in Mobile, Ala., on federal firearms charges.

MOBILE, Alabama – Developer Matthew Boykin Walker admitted three years ago to harboring more than $500,000 worth of stolen antiques but avoided prison time when it came to his sentencing.
On Friday, the scion of a wealthy and prominent south Alabama family was not as fortunate as he stood in federal court to answer for a criminal charge related to the break-in of his elderly uncle’s hunting camp in McIntosh.
Following a lengthy sentencing hearing, U.S. District Judge Kristi DuBose sentenced Walker to five years and three months in prison – higher than prosecutors had requested – and toyed with the idea of imposing even harsher punishment.
DuBose shot down a suggestion by defense attorney John White that she hand down a non-prison sentence that would include time spent at Serenity Care, a substance abuse treatment program where Walker performed community service as part of his probation in the state case related to the stolen antiques.
The judge noted that Walker, 63, met his co-defendants in the federal case at that facility and got them involved. She suggested that the defendant took advantage of troubled men.
“You’ve got to be kidding,” she said.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Gina Vann, in honoring the plea agreement she struck with the defendant, stuck to the recommendation of a prison sentence of four years and three months. But she blasted what she regarded as his “self-serving” explanation in court Friday.
“He was born on third base and is sitting in here now acting like he hit a triple,” she said.
“He put on a charade here today.”
Leniency for co-defendants
DuBose sentenced co-defendants Timothy Smith and Kristopher Joseph Ambrose to lighter sentences, giving them breaks for their cooperation, which included testimony on Friday against Walker.
DuBose ordered Walker pay his uncle, Bob Boykin, $42,000 that remains unaccounted for from the theft of his safe.
Walker, a relative of the late Congressman Frank Boykin, was on probation in the stolen-antiques case when he and Smith removed a large safe from the McIntosh cabin in February. Smith, whom DuBose sentenced to two years and four months for possession of stolen firearms, testified that Walker asked him to ride up with him to help him retrieve some important papers from Boykin’s property.
When they got there, Smith said, he and Walker pushed the safe across the floor and loaded it into the back of Walker’s pickup truck. They then drove to Walker’s home in south Mobile County, Smith testified. He said Walker got a blowtorch from Dog River Marina and that the two men worked together to cut a hole in the back of the safe.
Smith said that, under Walker’s instructions, he loaded the guns onto the truck, helped him take the weapons to his boat in the marina and then helped him dump the empty safe off of a bridge into the river. He said Walker gave him $4,100.
During cross-examination, White suggested that Smith threatened Walker. He sought to discredit the witness by pointing to previous arrests on assault, theft and burglary charges.
Walker disputed Smith’s account. He testified that Smith came to his house in the middle of the night acting “absolutely bizarre” and that it was his idea to steal the guns. He said he agreed to go with Smith to the hunting camp and did help him load the safe onto the truck. He said it was Smith who had the blowtorch and used it to open the safe. He said Smith grabbed a $100 bill and an envelope with $4,000 that came out of the safe.
Ambrose testified that Walker asked him to drive him to Talladega to sell some guns. He said he agreed but found that Walker instead stopped at a Lowe’s store and bought a Dremel tool before driving to Dog River Marina.
Ambrose, 29, testified that Walker used the Dremel tool to shave off the serial numbers on the long guns. Ambrose said that at one point, Walker said he had to go pick up his mother and asked him to finish shaving off the numbers and then polish the guns and put them in bubble wrap.
Later, Ambrose said, Walker had him move the wrapped guns from the boat to another vessel. He said Walker gave him $100.
After both men had been arrested, Ambrose said, Walker tried to get him lie about the incident.
“He wanted me to take full responsibility,” he said.
Walker testified that he asked Ambrose only to clean up the guns so they would be in good shape to return to Boykin. He testified that he never meant for Ambrose to grind off the serial numbers.
“He wasn’t clear what I was telling him to do,” he said.
DuBose said she found Ambrose’s version more credible. She said her intent was for the defendant to serve the 23-month sentence recommended by prosecutors. To achieve that, she sentenced him to the time he has been jailed since his arrest in order to get him into state custody to serve the balance of a 10-year sentence after a judge revoked his probation after his arrest on the federal charge.

‘Shamefully stupid decision’
Boykin’s mother, two family friends and the director of Serenity Care testified on his behalf.
White said his client was wrong to take possession of the stolen guns. But he said Walker went to his mother’s house to deliver the guns and alert his uncle. Without Walker’s actions, White said, law enforcement investigators may never have solved the crime.
“Everything leading up to it, not real good. Bad judgment on his part,” he said. “But we have to give him some sort of credit for his actions after the burglary.”
Walker, himself, expressed contrition. “I’ve made a shamefully, shamefully stupid decision,” he said.
But Detective Brian Myles, of the Mobile County Sheriff’s Office, testified that Boykin’s daughter told him that Walker told her that he wanted a $10,000 reward for returning the guns. He Boykin had $70,000 in cash, gold coins, 17 long guns and four pistols in the safe.
Boykin got back most of the coins, all of the guns and $28,000 that investigators found in a chest drawer in Walker’s home. Walker disputed that. He said he had hidden the money in the wall behind a piece of wood that he pointed out to the officers.
DuBose did not appear inclined to give Walker any credit for taking the guns to his mother’s home.
“Apparently, you were trying to give them back for a price,” she said. “I don’t find that admirable.”
Boykin’s son, Gunn Boykin, said he was glad his 92-year-old father did not have to come to court.
“This has been mentally and emotionally draining for him,” he said.

£40,000 worth of jewels stolen in raid on Salts Mill shop

 

Malcolm Gray inside the Salts Mill shop

An angry businessman said he wanted to “throttle” the thieves who stole “between £30,000 and £40,000“ worth of antique jewellery in a raid in Saltaire.
The raiders squeezed through a tiny window to strike at Carlton Fine Art and Antique Centre, Salts Mill, at some point between 5pm on Wednesday and 10am yesterday.
Proprietor Malcolm Gray, who rents out cabinet space in the centre to dealers, said the burglars targeted seven cabinets in particular, fleecing one of about £15,000 worth of jewellery alone.

The centre is on the second floor of the mill, said Mr Gray, who added: “They climbed onto the roof to get to my premises then broke in through a window to get in.
“It is a tiny window – about 17 inches by 11 inches.”
Mr Gray, 69, continued: “They have taken between £30,000 and £40,000 worth of jewellery – the majority of it was rings. Some bracelets, necklaces and brooches have gone as well.
“They have targeted seven cabinets in all. None of my stuff has gone, but one dealer’s cabinet has been emptied of £15,000 worth of rings, some of them diamond rings.
“They have been very selective in what they have targeted.”
He added: “I would throttle them.”

Mr Gray said whoever broke in had cut themselves on the window in the process, leaving behind DNA evidence for police.
He added: “They had to somehow get onto the roof of the mill, they have got to climb a drainpipe.
“Clearly they have targeted it and looked for a vulnerable point, which they have found and which we didn’t know we had.”
Mr Gray said it was Newark antiques fair yesterday and that the raiders could have targeted the goods with one eye on selling them at the fair.
Mr Gray said he has traded as an antiques dealer in Saltaire for 25 years and not once has his business in the mill been hit.
“It is so unexpected with my position,” he said.
A spokesman for West Yorkshire Police said: “Police were called at about 10am to a report of a burglary at an antiques dealers in the Salts Mill in Saltaire.
“It is believed the offence took place overnight and a number of antiques and jewellery have been reported stolen.

Appeal after Huntingdonshire antiques thieves strike

A desperate appeal has been made for the return of jewellery and antiques stolen in a break-in at a house in Huntingdonshire.
The property, worth thousands of pounds, is said to be of great sentimental value to its owners.
Burglars forced their way into the house in Fenton Road, Fenton, near Warboys, between 1.45pm and 3.30pm on August 13.
They took property including a distinctive Cloisonne carriage clock, a silver spoon and fork christening set with a birch leaf pattern, a set of silver grapefruit spoons, an amethyst and diamond necklace and earrings, a gold pendant, a gold bracelet, a kings pattern silverware set, a Dell laptop and a Samsung tablet.
PC Mark Joslin said: “Many of the items are antiques and hold sentimental value to the victim.
“They are desperate for the items to be returned and I would urge anyone who is offered these items to call police.”